Twitter blowing up shocked that Zucker wasn't part of this deal.

Twitter blowing up shocked that Zucker wasn't part of this deal.
Couple observations...Coyle may be a journeyman role player but he's been better than that this post season. He's been hard to play against and is noticeable in a good way everywhere on the ice. The kid doesn't seem to have the knack for scoring, which will probably hold him back, but he's been a nice add for Boston.team22tank wrote: ↑Thu May 30 3:50 pmIt is no ones fault. Charlie isn't a Marchand, Pastrnak, Bergeron, Krecji, he is a roll player and that is why he is fitting in so well they have the big horses. The Wild don't and Charlie as we know wasn't going to be one here.
Boston was also fine when Coyle wasn't producing much in the regular a season, again they have the horses.
Coyle is in a career making...actually lifetime making situation, he couldn’t possibly be more motivated to succeed in the Finals in this situation.streakygopher wrote: ↑Thu May 30 7:38 pmCouple observations...Coyle may be a journeyman role player but he's been better than that this post season. He's been hard to play against and is noticeable in a good way everywhere on the ice. The kid doesn't seem to have the knack for scoring, which will probably hold him back, but he's been a nice add for Boston.team22tank wrote: ↑Thu May 30 3:50 pmIt is no ones fault. Charlie isn't a Marchand, Pastrnak, Bergeron, Krecji, he is a roll player and that is why he is fitting in so well they have the big horses. The Wild don't and Charlie as we know wasn't going to be one here.
Boston was also fine when Coyle wasn't producing much in the regular a season, again they have the horses.
Marchand is really good when he's on, but he's made some gawdawfully bad decisions in the past game or two...bone headed even.
Well yeah, if anyone is extrapolating a lot out of a single game stat they’re probably doing it wrong. Anything can happen in a single game of hockey.Vegoe wrote: ↑Thu May 30 11:41 amVegoe wrote: ↑Fri May 24 9:16 amIf you are counting on your wings to play shutdown defense all of the time, then you have bigger troubles on your roster. They obviously have some responsibility in the defensive zone as you can't play 4 on 5 there, but those are your talents that you have to let loose a bit. I think the problem with Vanek was that he wasn't able to sustain much offense without lots of helpers. Kessel won't have that issue and he will make other players around him better.
$ - https://theathletic.com/991843/2019/05/ ... er-sports/
UAA's favorite son Justin Bourne wrote about why hockey analysis is hard work and dropped an interesting nugget in there that I thought was worth sharing.
"We as fans are certainly entitled to having our journalists and reporters doing a proper amount of work before sharing their opinions, but they can’t just be based on numbers. A stat like single-game Corsi is, to use internet speak, often insanely bad (I feel wingers in particular here are at the mercy of small sample events out of their control)."
This is so true... so little of a minus can usually be attributed to wings. They're in there to create chances, ignite chaos. Something to keep in mind.
https://theathletic.com/1004393/2019/05 ... wNSxCImjYEWith Zucker on the ice, the Wild create more dangerous opportunities than the Golden Knights with Marchessault or the Penguins with Kessel, but the even larger difference is in their own zone. Zucker’s play defensively is a net positive while the latter two seem to bleed chances, specifically Kessel who has very much earned his reputation as a weak defensive player over the last few seasons. The points from Kessel and Marchessault are nice but don’t mean much if the two just end up giving it back the other way. The difference between the expected goals rate for Zucker and the other two is massive and more than makes up for the difference in production. Even by actual goals, the Wild are at plus-0.89 per 60 with Zucker on the ice over the last three seasons, while Marchessault is at plus-0.36 and Kessel is at plus-0.32.
I read this article this morning as well, like you said the stats say a lot if you want to put faith behind them. Most professional leagues are stat driven to equal success and while stats like +/- are laughable what this author pointed out statwise makes good points. IMOScoobyDoo wrote: ↑Fri May 31 9:03 amIt's funny when real stats blow the conventional wisdom out of the water. Oh, and THIS IS NOT RUSSO.
https://theathletic.com/1004393/2019/05 ... wNSxCImjYEWith Zucker on the ice, the Wild create more dangerous opportunities than the Golden Knights with Marchessault or the Penguins with Kessel, but the even larger difference is in their own zone. Zucker’s play defensively is a net positive while the latter two seem to bleed chances, specifically Kessel who has very much earned his reputation as a weak defensive player over the last few seasons. The points from Kessel and Marchessault are nice but don’t mean much if the two just end up giving it back the other way. The difference between the expected goals rate for Zucker and the other two is massive and more than makes up for the difference in production. Even by actual goals, the Wild are at plus-0.89 per 60 with Zucker on the ice over the last three seasons, while Marchessault is at plus-0.36 and Kessel is at plus-0.32.
Than the players Scooby is now talking about weighing down the team. (Parise, Suter and Koivu)
It helps when you have the squad Boston has. It also isnt like he didnt have the chance to prove he was a great playoff player here...in 44 games he had 15 points. His ascension is more to do with Boston being great than him being better.streakygopher wrote: ↑Thu May 30 7:38 pmCouple observations...Coyle may be a journeyman role player but he's been better than that this post season. He's been hard to play against and is noticeable in a good way everywhere on the ice. The kid doesn't seem to have the knack for scoring, which will probably hold him back, but he's been a nice add for Boston.team22tank wrote: ↑Thu May 30 3:50 pmIt is no ones fault. Charlie isn't a Marchand, Pastrnak, Bergeron, Krecji, he is a roll player and that is why he is fitting in so well they have the big horses. The Wild don't and Charlie as we know wasn't going to be one here.
Boston was also fine when Coyle wasn't producing much in the regular a season, again they have the horses.
Marchand is really good when he's on, but he's made some gawdawfully bad decisions in the past game or two...bone headed even.
Sure. When did Koivu, Suter, or Parise elevate anyone around them? Ever.
I don't think Fletcher envisioned Coyle, Nino, Zucker and company all needing their hands held by Parise, Suter and Koivu (as you thing is needed) as 6th/7th year pros in their mid/late 20s.
That is to level headed of a response, not entertaining.Handyman wrote: ↑Fri May 31 10:28 amIt helps when you have the squad Boston has. It also isnt like he didnt have the chance to prove he was a great playoff player here...in 44 games he had 15 points. His ascension is more to do with Boston being great than him being better.streakygopher wrote: ↑Thu May 30 7:38 pmCouple observations...Coyle may be a journeyman role player but he's been better than that this post season. He's been hard to play against and is noticeable in a good way everywhere on the ice. The kid doesn't seem to have the knack for scoring, which will probably hold him back, but he's been a nice add for Boston.team22tank wrote: ↑Thu May 30 3:50 pmIt is no ones fault. Charlie isn't a Marchand, Pastrnak, Bergeron, Krecji, he is a roll player and that is why he is fitting in so well they have the big horses. The Wild don't and Charlie as we know wasn't going to be one here.
Boston was also fine when Coyle wasn't producing much in the regular a season, again they have the horses.
Marchand is really good when he's on, but he's made some gawdawfully bad decisions in the past game or two...bone headed even.
If they never had the horses (as apparently Boston has) than what was the point of going all in on Hanzal? That trade probably set them back another two years into actually building something meaningful.team22tank wrote: ↑Fri May 31 10:42 amThat is to level headed of a response, not entertaining.Handyman wrote: ↑Fri May 31 10:28 amIt helps when you have the squad Boston has. It also isnt like he didnt have the chance to prove he was a great playoff player here...in 44 games he had 15 points. His ascension is more to do with Boston being great than him being better.streakygopher wrote: ↑Thu May 30 7:38 pmCouple observations...Coyle may be a journeyman role player but he's been better than that this post season. He's been hard to play against and is noticeable in a good way everywhere on the ice. The kid doesn't seem to have the knack for scoring, which will probably hold him back, but he's been a nice add for Boston.team22tank wrote: ↑Thu May 30 3:50 pmIt is no ones fault. Charlie isn't a Marchand, Pastrnak, Bergeron, Krecji, he is a roll player and that is why he is fitting in so well they have the big horses. The Wild don't and Charlie as we know wasn't going to be one here.
Boston was also fine when Coyle wasn't producing much in the regular a season, again they have the horses.
Marchand is really good when he's on, but he's made some gawdawfully bad decisions in the past game or two...bone headed even.
Coyle rules, Parise, Suter, Koivu suck, throw in Oates as well.
I agree. 2nd place that year and they went the rental route and it didn't work. Nashville did that this year, look at the multiple moves they made and had to give up, they have Cap issues galore and now are out a lot of resources as well.ScoobyDoo wrote: ↑Fri May 31 10:46 amIf they never had the horses (as apparently Boston has) than what was the point of going all in on Hanzal? That trade probably set them back another two years into actually building something meaningful.team22tank wrote: ↑Fri May 31 10:42 amThat is to level headed of a response, not entertaining.Handyman wrote: ↑Fri May 31 10:28 amIt helps when you have the squad Boston has. It also isnt like he didnt have the chance to prove he was a great playoff player here...in 44 games he had 15 points. His ascension is more to do with Boston being great than him being better.streakygopher wrote: ↑Thu May 30 7:38 pmCouple observations...Coyle may be a journeyman role player but he's been better than that this post season. He's been hard to play against and is noticeable in a good way everywhere on the ice. The kid doesn't seem to have the knack for scoring, which will probably hold him back, but he's been a nice add for Boston.team22tank wrote: ↑Thu May 30 3:50 pmIt is no ones fault. Charlie isn't a Marchand, Pastrnak, Bergeron, Krecji, he is a roll player and that is why he is fitting in so well they have the big horses. The Wild don't and Charlie as we know wasn't going to be one here.
Boston was also fine when Coyle wasn't producing much in the regular a season, again they have the horses.
Marchand is really good when he's on, but he's made some gawdawfully bad decisions in the past game or two...bone headed even.
Coyle rules, Parise, Suter, Koivu suck, throw in Oates as well.
What do you advise?
Bless you for trying. Dude is either an employee or just plain drunk on the kool aid.ScoobyDoo wrote: ↑Fri May 31 12:10 pmFirst of all stop giving players away.
Second, when you make a lopsided trade make sure they throw in a pick.
Third, ultimately you're going to have to keep missing the playoffs and hope you get lucky for once and get to draft a generational talent.
No, I'm not suggesting they tank. They have to field a team.
Fenton sucks, Fletcher actually had it right, I just listened to an 11th Russo podcast.Thirty-Four wrote: ↑Fri May 31 12:45 pmBless you for trying. Dude is either an employee or just plain drunk on the kool aid.ScoobyDoo wrote: ↑Fri May 31 12:10 pmFirst of all stop giving players away.
Second, when you make a lopsided trade make sure they throw in a pick.
Third, ultimately you're going to have to keep missing the playoffs and hope you get lucky for once and get to draft a generational talent.
No, I'm not suggesting they tank. They have to field a team.
This pretty much sums it up. And to say Fenton is off to a shaky start as GM is dead on, coupled with his very insecure personality, he better pick it up significantly or he will be shown the door by this time next year, if not sooner.
I hear nothing in there that disputes what Russo has said. Nothing. And yes, I found the right part the broadcast.J22 wrote: ↑Fri May 31 4:24 pmBob Mckenzie blowing holes in all of the BS that Russo has been spewing.
https://www.tsn.ca/radio/toronto-1050/t ... -1.1314684
Check your hearingScoobyDoo wrote: ↑Fri May 31 4:32 pmI hear nothing in there that disputes what Russo has said. Nothing. And yes, I found the right part the broadcast.J22 wrote: ↑Fri May 31 4:24 pmBob Mckenzie blowing holes in all of the BS that Russo has been spewing.
https://www.tsn.ca/radio/toronto-1050/t ... -1.1314684
I’m with Scooby.J22 wrote: ↑Fri May 31 4:24 pmBob Mckenzie blowing holes in all of the BS that Russo has been spewing.
https://www.tsn.ca/radio/toronto-1050/t ... -1.1314684
McKenzie -"I wouldn't be surprised if the trade gets done with Minnesota". "Kessel's no to Pittsburgh about Minnesota wasn't really a hard 100% no, so much as it was asking them to check with other teams".F Da Sue wrote: ↑Fri May 31 6:23 pmI’m with Scooby.J22 wrote: ↑Fri May 31 4:24 pmBob Mckenzie blowing holes in all of the BS that Russo has been spewing.
https://www.tsn.ca/radio/toronto-1050/t ... -1.1314684
The only thing that McKenzie is reporting that’s different than Russo is that the Rask and Johnson contracts would also be traded. McKenzie then says he could be wrong on this however.
Nice try though.
Even that quote is not “blowing holes” in Russo’s story. LolJ22 wrote: ↑Fri May 31 6:44 pmMcKenzie -"I wouldn't be surprised if the trade gets done with Minnesota". "Kessel's no to Pittsburgh about Minnesota wasn't really a hard 100% no, so much as it was asking them to check with other teams".F Da Sue wrote: ↑Fri May 31 6:23 pmI’m with Scooby.J22 wrote: ↑Fri May 31 4:24 pmBob Mckenzie blowing holes in all of the BS that Russo has been spewing.
https://www.tsn.ca/radio/toronto-1050/t ... -1.1314684
The only thing that McKenzie is reporting that’s different than Russo is that the Rask and Johnson contracts would also be traded. McKenzie then says he could be wrong on this however.
Nice try though.
Also, not once does he go the tabloid route like Russo has been doing. Trying to paint Fenton in a bad light because he had a call with Kessel, god forbid. And spins it as, since Kessel hasnt approved the deal they are not a destination, and then continues to stretch into Fenton could have a tough off season going after FA.J22 wrote: ↑Fri May 31 6:44 pmMcKenzie -"I wouldn't be surprised if the trade gets done with Minnesota". "Kessel's no to Pittsburgh about Minnesota wasn't really a hard 100% no, so much as it was asking them to check with other teams".F Da Sue wrote: ↑Fri May 31 6:23 pmI’m with Scooby.J22 wrote: ↑Fri May 31 4:24 pmBob Mckenzie blowing holes in all of the BS that Russo has been spewing.
https://www.tsn.ca/radio/toronto-1050/t ... -1.1314684
The only thing that McKenzie is reporting that’s different than Russo is that the Rask and Johnson contracts would also be traded. McKenzie then says he could be wrong on this however.
Nice try though.
Is credibility what the end goal is?Thirty-Four wrote: ↑Fri May 31 7:06 pmI think the main point here is that this isn't an attractive organization to join at this time. Fenton looks overmatched and the fanbase is watching teams that retooled already lapping the Wild again. It's ok to be SuperFan #1, no issues there, but it leaves little in the way of credibility.
It just shows that Russo has no idea what he's talking about and is making $h!t up as he goesAlby22 wrote: ↑Fri May 31 6:58 pmEven that quote is not “blowing holes” in Russo’s story. LolJ22 wrote: ↑Fri May 31 6:44 pmMcKenzie -"I wouldn't be surprised if the trade gets done with Minnesota". "Kessel's no to Pittsburgh about Minnesota wasn't really a hard 100% no, so much as it was asking them to check with other teams".F Da Sue wrote: ↑Fri May 31 6:23 pmI’m with Scooby.J22 wrote: ↑Fri May 31 4:24 pmBob Mckenzie blowing holes in all of the BS that Russo has been spewing.
https://www.tsn.ca/radio/toronto-1050/t ... -1.1314684
The only thing that McKenzie is reporting that’s different than Russo is that the Rask and Johnson contracts would also be traded. McKenzie then says he could be wrong on this however.
Nice try though.
He knows what he is doing. He knows he is entertaining part of the fan base and they eat it up.J22 wrote: ↑Fri May 31 7:10 pmIt just shows that Russo has no idea what he's talking about and is making $h!t up as he goesAlby22 wrote: ↑Fri May 31 6:58 pmEven that quote is not “blowing holes” in Russo’s story. LolJ22 wrote: ↑Fri May 31 6:44 pmMcKenzie -"I wouldn't be surprised if the trade gets done with Minnesota". "Kessel's no to Pittsburgh about Minnesota wasn't really a hard 100% no, so much as it was asking them to check with other teams".F Da Sue wrote: ↑Fri May 31 6:23 pmI’m with Scooby.J22 wrote: ↑Fri May 31 4:24 pmBob Mckenzie blowing holes in all of the BS that Russo has been spewing.
https://www.tsn.ca/radio/toronto-1050/t ... -1.1314684
The only thing that McKenzie is reporting that’s different than Russo is that the Rask and Johnson contracts would also be traded. McKenzie then says he could be wrong on this however.
Nice try though.
Just look at who he does his podcasts with.team22tank wrote: ↑Fri May 31 7:15 pmHe knows what he is doing. He knows he is entertaining part of the fan base and they eat it up.J22 wrote: ↑Fri May 31 7:10 pmIt just shows that Russo has no idea what he's talking about and is making $h!t up as he goesAlby22 wrote: ↑Fri May 31 6:58 pmEven that quote is not “blowing holes” in Russo’s story. LolJ22 wrote: ↑Fri May 31 6:44 pmMcKenzie -"I wouldn't be surprised if the trade gets done with Minnesota". "Kessel's no to Pittsburgh about Minnesota wasn't really a hard 100% no, so much as it was asking them to check with other teams".F Da Sue wrote: ↑Fri May 31 6:23 pmI’m with Scooby.J22 wrote: ↑Fri May 31 4:24 pmBob Mckenzie blowing holes in all of the BS that Russo has been spewing.
https://www.tsn.ca/radio/toronto-1050/t ... -1.1314684
The only thing that McKenzie is reporting that’s different than Russo is that the Rask and Johnson contracts would also be traded. McKenzie then says he could be wrong on this however.
Nice try though.
Plus he has an axe to grind with Fenton.
Not here to defend Russo but I think the record needs correcting. He's already a columnist. Everyone at The Athletic is columnist. He, and everyone else that is hired is under no obligation as a beat writer to write what are called "gamers". Gamers are usually what you see in the Strib. Pioneer Press where they spout out what happened during the game. The only reason Russo still writes them is because his readers insist on it. He's stated this many times.Handyman wrote: ↑Fri May 31 9:06 pmI have no idea if Fenton is any good though I am hardly impressed ...but the love affair fans have with Russo is kind of funny and I have said that for years. (back when he defended everything they did as opposed to now) Half the time it seems the guy is angling for a future career as a columnist or something like Souhan was when he was beat writer for the Twins.
I don’t want to give Zucker away, he has explosive speed, which is hard to find, if we trade him, we need to receive significant value back. I’m OK with keeping him too, but a guy writing an article arguing to keep Zucker due to his defensive ability...is a stats guy who doesn’t actually watch him play NHL games. Overall I like Russo, especially his passion for the job. That said, Fentons style CLEARLY rubs Russo the wrong way...so he’s not going to hesitate criticizing him (at will) when he spots an opening, and Fenton has supplied his fair share of openings...with more likely on the horizon.ScoobyDoo wrote: ↑Fri May 31 9:48 pmNot here to defend Russo but I think the record needs correcting. He's already a columnist. Everyone at The Athletic is columnist. He, and everyone else that is hired is under no obligation as a beat writer to write what are called "gamers". Gamers are usually what you see in the Strib. Pioneer Press where they spout out what happened during the game. The only reason Russo still writes them is because his readers insist on it. He's stated this many times.Handyman wrote: ↑Fri May 31 9:06 pmI have no idea if Fenton is any good though I am hardly impressed ...but the love affair fans have with Russo is kind of funny and I have said that for years. (back when he defended everything they did as opposed to now) Half the time it seems the guy is angling for a future career as a columnist or something like Souhan was when he was beat writer for the Twins.
He's beloved because he's accessible. And he does his job and he does it well. In the past few years he was awarded some award that amounts to "beat writer" of the year or something like that so he's also well liked and respected by his peers.
So, I have no idea what you're talking about. At all.
And, on the Zucker issue we've long moved on from Russo. At least I had. J22 brought him back in again. There was a very well written, stats galore, article on The Athletic arguing against the Zucker trade. Besides a small counter from team22tank it hasn't been disputed.
Either way Fenton got less than the Wild deserved for Granlund, Nino, and Coyle. That's well documented. And the Koivu, Parise, Suter era is either over or in freefall and it's record stands for itself.
Russo’s credibility is being questioned. You write paragraphs of positivity on the organization. Unless you post just for yourself, then yes, credibility is most important.team22tank wrote: ↑Fri May 31 7:10 pmIs credibility what the end goal is?Thirty-Four wrote: ↑Fri May 31 7:06 pmI think the main point here is that this isn't an attractive organization to join at this time. Fenton looks overmatched and the fanbase is watching teams that retooled already lapping the Wild again. It's ok to be SuperFan #1, no issues there, but it leaves little in the way of credibility.![]()
To think, wanting to see how some young kids develop next season and how the cap space is used instead of instantly calling Fenton a hero or zero right this second, means you are drinking the koolaid.
How Fletcher & Yeo & Boudreau & Fenton couldn’t figure out that Coyle is a CENTER and leave him in that position for an extended period of time...is simply beyond comprehension
Not me...I just think Russo is overrated.
It didnt work...but by that ridiculous logic we should never sign a scorer because one time it didnt work. Sports fans have zero logic about this stuff...
Not saying that. Saying that its not worth it to add an older player without the proper talent to put around him. He's not good enough to save this team from itself. And he's certainly not going to fix this locker room.
Definitely Russo Bobo stuff right there.
Nope. Not reading it from Russo at all. Try again. Or, put it this way. Because this is the anti-Russo thread I always get another source before I mention ANYTHING Russo said.team22tank wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06 10:36 amDefinitely Russo Bobo stuff right there.
In the last little bit of Wild discussion on GPL, that wasn't brought up, Zucker/Spurgeon same agent. But man has Russo been beating it to death the last month.
Bet you will never guess who Custance is using as his source?ScoobyDoo wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06 10:43 amNope. Not reading it from Russo at all. Try again. Or, put it this way. Because this is the anti-Russo thread I always get another source before I mention ANYTHING Russo said.team22tank wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06 10:36 amDefinitely Russo Bobo stuff right there.
In the last little bit of Wild discussion on GPL, that wasn't brought up, Zucker/Spurgeon same agent. But man has Russo been beating it to death the last month.
Won't be quoting or commenting on Russo anymore.
My source this time is Craig Custance.
J22 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06 12:13 pmBet you will never guess who Custance is using as his source?ScoobyDoo wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06 10:43 amNope. Not reading it from Russo at all. Try again. Or, put it this way. Because this is the anti-Russo thread I always get another source before I mention ANYTHING Russo said.team22tank wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06 10:36 amDefinitely Russo Bobo stuff right there.
In the last little bit of Wild discussion on GPL, that wasn't brought up, Zucker/Spurgeon same agent. But man has Russo been beating it to death the last month.
Won't be quoting or commenting on Russo anymore.
My source this time is Craig Custance.
https://www.post-gazette.com/sports/ron ... 1906050058The Penguins had the deal in place to trade Kessel. This wasn’t just speculation. It would have been nice if it had gone through. I’m hoping it still will. Zucker is a solid player with the skating speed to play Sullivan’s preferred game and a decent scoring touch with an average of 25 goals the past three seasons. It’s a bit troubling this isn’t the first time the Wild tried to trade Zucker, but I could have moved past that. I’m not exactly expecting a big return for Kessel. The Penguins might not get much more than much-needed salary cap relief.
Other teams know Kessel is hard on coaches. He has worn out his welcome here — just as he did in Toronto and Boston — despite his point-a-game resume and his team-leading work on the power play. He doesn’t have much of a work ethic. He doesn’t believe in practicing hard, which sets a bad example for his younger teammates. He’s hardly in the best shape.
I have a hard time seeing Rutherford finding a taker willing to give back anything close to equal value for Kessel.
I keep hearing Arizona is a likely destination for Kessel, but I’m not buying it. I’m not convinced Coyotes coach Rick Tocchet wants Kessel even though he was the Kessel Whisperer when he was an assistant here on Sullivan’s staff. The Tocchet-Kessel relationship wouldn’t be the same with Tocchet as the head coach.
ScoobyDoo wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06 1:41 pmhttps://www.post-gazette.com/sports/ron ... 1906050058The Penguins had the deal in place to trade Kessel. This wasn’t just speculation. It would have been nice if it had gone through. I’m hoping it still will. Zucker is a solid player with the skating speed to play Sullivan’s preferred game and a decent scoring touch with an average of 25 goals the past three seasons. It’s a bit troubling this isn’t the first time the Wild tried to trade Zucker, but I could have moved past that. I’m not exactly expecting a big return for Kessel. The Penguins might not get much more than much-needed salary cap relief.
Other teams know Kessel is hard on coaches. He has worn out his welcome here — just as he did in Toronto and Boston — despite his point-a-game resume and his team-leading work on the power play. He doesn’t have much of a work ethic. He doesn’t believe in practicing hard, which sets a bad example for his younger teammates. He’s hardly in the best shape.
I have a hard time seeing Rutherford finding a taker willing to give back anything close to equal value for Kessel.
I keep hearing Arizona is a likely destination for Kessel, but I’m not buying it. I’m not convinced Coyotes coach Rick Tocchet wants Kessel even though he was the Kessel Whisperer when he was an assistant here on Sullivan’s staff. The Tocchet-Kessel relationship wouldn’t be the same with Tocchet as the head coach.
I'm sure he uses Russo as a source so it's irrelevant.GopherPete wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06 4:23 pmScoobyDoo wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06 1:41 pmhttps://www.post-gazette.com/sports/ron ... 1906050058The Penguins had the deal in place to trade Kessel. This wasn’t just speculation. It would have been nice if it had gone through. I’m hoping it still will. Zucker is a solid player with the skating speed to play Sullivan’s preferred game and a decent scoring touch with an average of 25 goals the past three seasons. It’s a bit troubling this isn’t the first time the Wild tried to trade Zucker, but I could have moved past that. I’m not exactly expecting a big return for Kessel. The Penguins might not get much more than much-needed salary cap relief.
Other teams know Kessel is hard on coaches. He has worn out his welcome here — just as he did in Toronto and Boston — despite his point-a-game resume and his team-leading work on the power play. He doesn’t have much of a work ethic. He doesn’t believe in practicing hard, which sets a bad example for his younger teammates. He’s hardly in the best shape.
I have a hard time seeing Rutherford finding a taker willing to give back anything close to equal value for Kessel.
I keep hearing Arizona is a likely destination for Kessel, but I’m not buying it. I’m not convinced Coyotes coach Rick Tocchet wants Kessel even though he was the Kessel Whisperer when he was an assistant here on Sullivan’s staff. The Tocchet-Kessel relationship wouldn’t be the same with Tocchet as the head coach.
I know someone mentioned this recently and I've also brought it up previously, and people seemed to take offense to it, but clearly it is a real concern.
What would be the concern?GopherPete wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06 4:23 pmScoobyDoo wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06 1:41 pmhttps://www.post-gazette.com/sports/ron ... 1906050058The Penguins had the deal in place to trade Kessel. This wasn’t just speculation. It would have been nice if it had gone through. I’m hoping it still will. Zucker is a solid player with the skating speed to play Sullivan’s preferred game and a decent scoring touch with an average of 25 goals the past three seasons. It’s a bit troubling this isn’t the first time the Wild tried to trade Zucker, but I could have moved past that. I’m not exactly expecting a big return for Kessel. The Penguins might not get much more than much-needed salary cap relief.
Other teams know Kessel is hard on coaches. He has worn out his welcome here — just as he did in Toronto and Boston — despite his point-a-game resume and his team-leading work on the power play. He doesn’t have much of a work ethic. He doesn’t believe in practicing hard, which sets a bad example for his younger teammates. He’s hardly in the best shape.
I have a hard time seeing Rutherford finding a taker willing to give back anything close to equal value for Kessel.
I keep hearing Arizona is a likely destination for Kessel, but I’m not buying it. I’m not convinced Coyotes coach Rick Tocchet wants Kessel even though he was the Kessel Whisperer when he was an assistant here on Sullivan’s staff. The Tocchet-Kessel relationship wouldn’t be the same with Tocchet as the head coach.
I know someone mentioned this recently and I've also brought it up previously, and people seemed to take offense to it, but clearly it is a real concern.
If Spurgeon's agent is willing to use Spurgeon and his next contract as a tool to get even for Jason Zucker? Then Spurgeon and Zucker both desperately need a new agent.
LOL
The Custance article?
I have to say you referring to someone else as a Bobo cracks me up.team22tank wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06 10:36 amDefinitely Russo Bobo stuff right there.
In the last little bit of Wild discussion on GPL, that wasn't brought up, Zucker/Spurgeon same agent. But man has Russo been beating it to death the last month.
Well playedsunbone wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06 5:40 pmI have to say you referring to someone else as a Bobo cracks me up.team22tank wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06 10:36 amDefinitely Russo Bobo stuff right there.
In the last little bit of Wild discussion on GPL, that wasn't brought up, Zucker/Spurgeon same agent. But man has Russo been beating it to death the last month.![]()
I don't know if you noticed the bolded section, but having that type of reputation is definitely a concern. Not only that, but as he ages he will fall off quickly due to being in terrible condition.J22 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06 4:48 pmWhat would be the concern?GopherPete wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06 4:23 pmScoobyDoo wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06 1:41 pmhttps://www.post-gazette.com/sports/ron ... 1906050058The Penguins had the deal in place to trade Kessel. This wasn’t just speculation. It would have been nice if it had gone through. I’m hoping it still will. Zucker is a solid player with the skating speed to play Sullivan’s preferred game and a decent scoring touch with an average of 25 goals the past three seasons. It’s a bit troubling this isn’t the first time the Wild tried to trade Zucker, but I could have moved past that. I’m not exactly expecting a big return for Kessel. The Penguins might not get much more than much-needed salary cap relief.
Other teams know Kessel is hard on coaches. He has worn out his welcome here — just as he did in Toronto and Boston — despite his point-a-game resume and his team-leading work on the power play. He doesn’t have much of a work ethic. He doesn’t believe in practicing hard, which sets a bad example for his younger teammates. He’s hardly in the best shape.
I have a hard time seeing Rutherford finding a taker willing to give back anything close to equal value for Kessel.
I keep hearing Arizona is a likely destination for Kessel, but I’m not buying it. I’m not convinced Coyotes coach Rick Tocchet wants Kessel even though he was the Kessel Whisperer when he was an assistant here on Sullivan’s staff. The Tocchet-Kessel relationship wouldn’t be the same with Tocchet as the head coach.
I know someone mentioned this recently and I've also brought it up previously, and people seemed to take offense to it, but clearly it is a real concern.
That's another article from another team (like the Pitt one I linked above) where they're thrilled to be getting Zucker for whoever Fenton wants.Vegoe wrote: ↑Fri Jun 07 9:45 amhttps://theprovince.com/sports/hockey/n ... re-talking
Who the heck would they get back? The No. 10 pick would be nicer than what they have on their NHL roster.
I guess we're having this conversation again. Could you please tell me the last time that Phil Kessel missed a game? Then could you please tell me what were his two most productive seasons? Thanks.GopherPete wrote: ↑Fri Jun 07 8:18 amI don't know if you noticed the bolded section, but having that type of reputation is definitely a concern. Not only that, but as he ages he will fall off quickly due to being in terrible condition.J22 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06 4:48 pmWhat would be the concern?GopherPete wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06 4:23 pmScoobyDoo wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06 1:41 pmhttps://www.post-gazette.com/sports/ron ... 1906050058The Penguins had the deal in place to trade Kessel. This wasn’t just speculation. It would have been nice if it had gone through. I’m hoping it still will. Zucker is a solid player with the skating speed to play Sullivan’s preferred game and a decent scoring touch with an average of 25 goals the past three seasons. It’s a bit troubling this isn’t the first time the Wild tried to trade Zucker, but I could have moved past that. I’m not exactly expecting a big return for Kessel. The Penguins might not get much more than much-needed salary cap relief.
Other teams know Kessel is hard on coaches. He has worn out his welcome here — just as he did in Toronto and Boston — despite his point-a-game resume and his team-leading work on the power play. He doesn’t have much of a work ethic. He doesn’t believe in practicing hard, which sets a bad example for his younger teammates. He’s hardly in the best shape.
I have a hard time seeing Rutherford finding a taker willing to give back anything close to equal value for Kessel.
I keep hearing Arizona is a likely destination for Kessel, but I’m not buying it. I’m not convinced Coyotes coach Rick Tocchet wants Kessel even though he was the Kessel Whisperer when he was an assistant here on Sullivan’s staff. The Tocchet-Kessel relationship wouldn’t be the same with Tocchet as the head coach.
I know someone mentioned this recently and I've also brought it up previously, and people seemed to take offense to it, but clearly it is a real concern.