Hobey Baker wrote:
Gagne to start season on DL for Rangers.
Hobey Baker wrote:Did anyone see that Bud Seligs salary as commissioner was $14.5 million dollars?
Dances With Gophers wrote:Hobey Baker wrote:Did anyone see that Bud Seligs salary as commissioner was $14.5 million dollars?
Yo dawg, that's, like, double this!
DrunkHockeyGuy wrote:He doesn't have a toupe? Why do I know this? Well I was on the road a few weeks ago and I was reading the USA Today sports page at breakfast and they were showing his habits and he FLY's to Milwaukee once a week to have the same guy cut his hair.They had a picture of him in the barber chair.
Bigbeer wrote:I'm sure #1 on his daily to-do list was "try to screw those stinkin' Twins"
Ben wrote:Bigbeer wrote:I'm sure #1 on his daily to-do list was "try to screw those stinkin' Twins"
From the desk of Bud "Moran" Selig
To do, 4/10/07
1) Ignore steroids
2) Screw up baseball even more
3)the Twins
4) Find yet another way to screw up baseball. Maybe call a tie in a World Series game
Greg Zwakman Fan wrote:There were just over 19,000 fans in Milwaukee last night to watch the Cleveland "home" game vs. the Angels.
That's a lot more than I thought would show up.
Ben wrote:Major League Baseball and ESPN honor Jackie Robinson by having Marlon Waynes speak before the Dodgers game last night.
People who should have been offered the gig ahead of Marlon Waynes: James Earl Jones, Samuel L. Jackson, Sidney Poitier, Morgan Freeman, Denzel Washington, Don Cheadle, Cuba Gooding Jr., Spike Lee, Ving Rhames, Michael Clark Duncan, Louis Gossett Jr., Halle Berre, Cicely Tyson, Jesse L. Martin Bill Cosby, Jaime Foxx, Angela Bassett, Will Smith, Sinbad, Taye Diggs, Omar Epps, Mike Epps, Ice Cube, Ice T, Donald Faison, Damon Waynes, Keenan Ivory Waynes, Al Jolson, and about 200 others.
Seriously, what the hell was MLB thinking? Was there possibly a worse choice than Marlon Waynes to speak about Jackie Robinson? Hank Aaron and Frank Robinson were there to throw out the 1st pitch. What a depressing joke.
Gophers4ever wrote:At Shea Selig retired the number 42 with the lovely Mrs Robinson and her family on hand.
Seriously, is this a great woman or what? Very eloquent and still looking good for a woman that has to be at least 80. Baseball could definitely use her as a Ambassador.
Ben wrote:Seriously, what the hell was MLB thinking? Was there possibly a worse choice than Marlon Waynes to speak about Jackie Robinson? Hank Aaron and Frank Robinson were there to throw out the 1st pitch. What a depressing joke.
sagard wrote:Ben wrote:Seriously, what the hell was MLB thinking? Was there possibly a worse choice than Marlon Waynes to speak about Jackie Robinson? Hank Aaron and Frank Robinson were there to throw out the 1st pitch. What a depressing joke.
I didn't hear/see him speak, but if he is a big baseball or Jackie Robinson fan I'd rather hear what he has to say vs. a bigger name who hasn't been to a game in 25 years.
Greyeagle wrote:sagard wrote:Ben wrote:Seriously, what the hell was MLB thinking? Was there possibly a worse choice than Marlon Waynes to speak about Jackie Robinson? Hank Aaron and Frank Robinson were there to throw out the 1st pitch. What a depressing joke.
I didn't hear/see him speak, but if he is a big baseball or Jackie Robinson fan I'd rather hear what he has to say vs. a bigger name who hasn't been to a game in 25 years.
He was certainly a better choice than one of the reverends who have been dominating the news lately.
Zwak wrote:Greyeagle wrote:sagard wrote:Ben wrote:Seriously, what the hell was MLB thinking? Was there possibly a worse choice than Marlon Waynes to speak about Jackie Robinson? Hank Aaron and Frank Robinson were there to throw out the 1st pitch. What a depressing joke.
I didn't hear/see him speak, but if he is a big baseball or Jackie Robinson fan I'd rather hear what he has to say vs. a bigger name who hasn't been to a game in 25 years.
He was certainly a better choice than one of the reverends who have been dominating the news lately.
Pure speculation on my part but maybe one of the reverends was their original choice but MLB got cold feet and had to settle for Marlon Wayans at the last minute.
Zwak wrote:Yes...I like sports but don't always know everything about them. I have another question.
How is it determined that someone is credited with a Sacrifice?
I know what a sacrifice is, but the announcer will sometimes say, "He should be credited with a sacrifice" but other times they will say that he won't be.
I'm confused (which should come as no surprise).
10.08 Sacrifices
The official scorer shall:
(a) Score a sacrifice bunt when, before two are out, the batter advances one or more runners with a bunt and is put out at first base, or would have been put out except for a fielding error, unless, in the judgment of the official scorer, the batter was bunting exclusively for a base hit and not sacrificing his own chance of reaching first base for the purpose of advancing a runner or runners, in which case the official scorer shall charge the batter with a time at bat;
Rule 10.08(a) Comment: In determining whether the batter had been sacrificing his own chance of reaching first base for the purpose of advancing a runner, the official scorer shall give the batter the benefit of the doubt. The official scorer shall consider the totality of the circumstances of the at-bat, including the inning, the number of outs and the score.
(b) Score a sacrifice bunt when, before two are out, the fielders handle a bunted ball without error in an unsuccessful attempt to put out a preceding runner advancing one base, unless, an attempt to turn a bunt into a putout of a preceding runner fails, and in the judgment of the official scorer ordinary effort would not have put out the batter at first base, in which case the batter shall be credited with a one-base hit and not a sacrifice;
(c) Not score a sacrifice bunt when any runner is put out attempting to advance one base on a bunt, in which case the official scorer shall charge the batter with a time at bat; and
(d) Score a sacrifice fly when, before two are out, the batter hits a ball in flight handled by an outfielder or an infielder running in the outfield in fair or foul territory that
(1) is caught, and a runner scores after the catch, or
(2) is dropped, and a runner scores, if in the scorer's judgment the runner could have scored after the catch had the fly been caught.
Rule 10.08(d) Comment: The official scorer shall score a sacrifice fly in accordance with Rule 10.08(d)(2) even though another runner is forced out by reason of the batter becoming a runner.

Zwak wrote:Yes...I like sports but don't always know everything about them. I have another question.
How is it determined that someone is credited with a Sacrifice?
I know what a sacrifice is, but the announcer will sometimes say, "He should be credited with a sacrifice" but other times they will say that he won't be.
I'm confused (which should come as no surprise).
Zwak wrote:Yes...I like sports but don't always know everything about them.
Zwak wrote:Here's a good trivia question I recently read:
If a batted ball hits the pitching rubber and proceeds to cross the baseline between home and first (or home and third), what is the call? The ball does not touch any player.
BTW, I think I read it in this book that I just bought.
http://www.amazon.com/Watching-Baseball ... 513&sr=1-1
It's a pretty good read. (Usual disclaimer - I have no connection to the book or author)
dailyfbo wrote:Zwak wrote:Here's a good trivia question I recently read:
If a batted ball hits the pitching rubber and proceeds to cross the baseline between home and first (or home and third), what is the call? The ball does not touch any player.
BTW, I think I read it in this book that I just bought.
http://www.amazon.com/Watching-Baseball ... 513&sr=1-1
It's a pretty good read. (Usual disclaimer - I have no connection to the book or author)
My first thought is that it should be ruled a foul ball. But I can also see the pitching rubber being regarded like a base and once the ball hits it, the ball is considered to be fair.
Is/was there really a rule that if a player picks up a live ball with any piece of equipment other than his glove, the baserunners move up three bases? I once read a story where Gene Mauch pulled that rule out of his memory banks after seeing an opposing catcher scoop up the ball with his mask.
Hobey Baker wrote:A Rod hits HR 11 and 12 in a loss to Boston today. A Rod now has 30 RBI's. This guy is on fire!
h8red wrote:Hobey Baker wrote:A Rod hits HR 11 and 12 in a loss to Boston today. A Rod now has 30 RBI's. This guy is on fire!
I think the stress of last year's poor season has gotten to him. I wouldn't be surprised if he has given in to the temptation of Mr. Steroid.
Hobey Baker wrote:Cub's Prior done for the season. Surgery is not career threatening but another set back for the pitcher. His future with the Cubs is unclear.
dxmnkd316 wrote:ESPN Radio is reporting that Joe Torre could be fired if the Sox sweep the yankees this time around.
Dumb move. Dumb dumb dumb. Probably one of the greatest managers in the history of the game and there is talk of firing him...
Hobey Baker wrote:Cub's Prior done for the season. Surgery is not career threatening but another set back for the pitcher. His future with the Cubs is unclear.
Paladin wrote:Good for you. FIRE MASON, HIRE allan!
MAP wrote:I mean come on, the Martians were killed off by awful music!!
I presume the good guys used "On Wisconsin" to accomplish the murder of the Martians?
erbear04 wrote:[url=http://mlb.mlb.com/news/press_releases/press_release.jsp?ymd=20070429&content_id=1936551&vkey=pr_stl&fext=.jsp&c_id=stl]Cardinals bullpen pitcher Josh Hancock killed in car accident late last night
[/url]
Zwak wrote:Troy Tulowitzki turned an unassisted triple play yesterday in the Rockies game vs. the Braves
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/recap?gam ... BHeadlines
Statistically it is the rarest event in baseball. This is only the 13th time in history it has happened.
...two were completed by first basemen who were able to reach second base before the returning baserunner.
Frontroguy wrote:So, Roger Clemens is "deciding" if he is going to play this year. With a 22 million contract, some club will pay him 12-13 million for 19 or so starts.
Last year, in his 19 starts he only gave up 4 or more runs 3 times, and ended the season with a 2.30 era. While I am not big on his not being with a club now, and not having to travel with them, I gotta say that is not a bad deal. In 5 of his 6 losses, the Astros scored 2 or fewer runs. In 4 of his 6 No decisions he gave up 2 or less runs.
I think Smiling Carl should pony up.
Thirty-Four wrote:Frontroguy wrote:So, Roger Clemens is "deciding" if he is going to play this year. With a 22 million contract, some club will pay him 12-13 million for 19 or so starts.
Last year, in his 19 starts he only gave up 4 or more runs 3 times, and ended the season with a 2.30 era. While I am not big on his not being with a club now, and not having to travel with them, I gotta say that is not a bad deal. In 5 of his 6 losses, the Astros scored 2 or fewer runs. In 4 of his 6 No decisions he gave up 2 or less runs.
I think Smiling Carl should pony up.
No thanks. We have much bigger needs that could be filled with that money. Plus, the Rocket's tank has to run out sometime soon, and if we got him, that is when it would happen.
Frontroguy wrote:So, Roger Clemens is "deciding" if he is going to play this year. With a 22 million contract, some club will pay him 12-13 million for 19 or so starts.
Last year, in his 19 starts he only gave up 4 or more runs 3 times, and ended the season with a 2.30 era. While I am not big on his not being with a club now, and not having to travel with them, I gotta say that is not a bad deal. In 5 of his 6 losses, the Astros scored 2 or fewer runs. In 4 of his 6 No decisions he gave up 2 or less runs.
I think Smiling Carl should pony up.
Cardinal wrote:http://withleather.com/post.phtml?pk=2752
Not totally MLB related, but pretty funny nonetheless...
Cardinal wrote:http://withleather.com/post.phtml?pk=2752
Not totally MLB related, but pretty funny nonetheless...
Bigbeer wrote:The guy who wrote that article should have put the final score and how the play affected the game.
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/baseball/2007-05-01-protest_N.htm
dxmnkd316 wrote:Bigbeer wrote:The guy who wrote that article should have put the final score and how the play affected the game.
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/baseball/2007-05-01-protest_N.htm
request.... DENIED!
Link
Zwak wrote:http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2860122
It's obviously tragic that he died. That said, he was drunk and didn't have a seatbelt on. Separately, these things drive me crazy. Together - I'm at a loss. Not to mention that there MAY be pot in his system too.
(I know it says the seatbelt probably wouldn't have helped, but he still should have been wearing it.)
Zwak wrote:http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2860122
It's obviously tragic that he died.
Hobey Baker wrote:$6.5 million per month.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests