Bash Brother wrote:I have heard JT Miller has backed out of his commitment to play for the Sue
FargoSiouxHater wrote:Bash Brother wrote:I have heard JT Miller has backed out of his commitment to play for the Sue
That is correct, going to the OHL.
Hammy wrote:Sounds like Luke Voltin and Luke Johnson are headed to the Sue.
thedude wrote:Hammy wrote:Sounds like Luke Voltin and Luke Johnson are headed to the Sue.
Voltin will fit right in up there...
Hammy wrote:thedude wrote:Hammy wrote:Sounds like Luke Voltin and Luke Johnson are headed to the Sue.
Voltin will fit right in up there...
Yes, I've heard the same things you seem to be getting at (but I don't know enough to give specifics).
george wrote:Hammy wrote:thedude wrote:Hammy wrote:Sounds like Luke Voltin and Luke Johnson are headed to the Sue.
Voltin will fit right in up there...
Yes, I've heard the same things you seem to be getting at (but I don't know enough to give specifics).
Is he hostile and abusive?
Gopherguy05 wrote:george wrote:Hammy wrote:thedude wrote:Hammy wrote:Sounds like Luke Voltin and Luke Johnson are headed to the Sue.
Voltin will fit right in up there...
Yes, I've heard the same things you seem to be getting at (but I don't know enough to give specifics).
Is he hostile and abusive?
More likely likes to throw lawnmowers and spray urine indiscriminately....
psych wrote:Gopherguy05 wrote:george wrote:Hammy wrote:thedude wrote:
Yes, I've heard the same things you seem to be getting at (but I don't know enough to give specifics).
Is he hostile and abusive?
More likely likes to throw lawnmowers and spray urine indiscriminately....
And wear no shoes in -30 degree weather. (Are we missing anything?)
“He’s a big strong, young man,” said Hill-Murray coach Bill Lechner, who had Voltin for the last two seasons. “He’s a very good skater, he has a nice shot, good hands, good feet. He has a good work ethic and he’s a very polite young man. Very quiet.”
dagies wrote:You're probably right. That's what the neighbors always say to the investigative news reporter.
JDUBBS1280 wrote:No surprise here, Quentin Shore commits to DU.
LeoPohl wrote:JDUBBS1280 wrote:No surprise here, Quentin Shore commits to DU.
For being in the middle of the country and a mile up they sure are putting together a good Shoreline.
(Cheesy, yes, but to good to pass up.)

Greyeagle wrote:LeoPohl wrote:JDUBBS1280 wrote:No surprise here, Quentin Shore commits to DU.
For being in the middle of the country and a mile up they sure are putting together a good Shoreline.
(Cheesy, yes, but to good to pass up.)
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
thedude wrote:Not really opponent recruiting, but i wasn't sure where to put it. Connor Beaupre is trying out for the London Knights of the Ontario league.

LeoPohl wrote:Not sure if I should do this or not, but yesterday marked the 25th anniversary of George Pelawa's death. For those who don't know his story, he starred at Bemidji HS, won Mister Hockey in 1986, and was about to start school at the University of North Dakota. Sadly, during his last days at home before leaving for Grand Forks, he was killed in an automobile accident just outside his home in the early morning hours of August 30th. I'm too young to remember, but those who saw him swear there has never been another quite like him.
During the draft, ESPN did a piece on him.
For those who want to do a little research on him: bing
DrunkHockeyGuy wrote:You wonder sometimes if the bulldogs really won a title. Haven't landed a good recruit yet imho. I really feel our assistants since Rohlik can't hold his jock in the recruiting game. Really sucks.
WPoS wrote:DrunkHockeyGuy wrote:You wonder sometimes if the bulldogs really won a title. Haven't landed a good recruit yet imho. I really feel our assistants since Rohlik can't hold his jock in the recruiting game. Really sucks.
sorry to break your nuts, but a random title win after years/decadeds of medocricy doesn't equate to instant recruiting prowess.
W
WPoS wrote:DrunkHockeyGuy wrote:You wonder sometimes if the bulldogs really won a title. Haven't landed a good recruit yet imho. I really feel our assistants since Rohlik can't hold his jock in the recruiting game. Really sucks.
sorry to break your nuts, but a random title win after years/decadeds of medocricy doesn't equate to instant recruiting prowess.
W
LeoPohl wrote:WPoS wrote:DrunkHockeyGuy wrote:You wonder sometimes if the bulldogs really won a title. Haven't landed a good recruit yet imho. I really feel our assistants since Rohlik can't hold his jock in the recruiting game. Really sucks.
sorry to break your nuts, but a random title win after years/decadeds of medocricy doesn't equate to instant recruiting prowess.
W
There were coaches at Duluth who could recruit?Where was I when this happened?
DrunkHockeyGuy wrote:You wonder sometimes if the bulldogs really won a title. Haven't landed a good recruit yet imho. I really feel our assistants since Rohlik can't hold his jock in the recruiting game. Really sucks.
DrunkHockeyGuy wrote:LeoPohl wrote:WPoS wrote:DrunkHockeyGuy wrote:You wonder sometimes if the bulldogs really won a title. Haven't landed a good recruit yet imho. I really feel our assistants since Rohlik can't hold his jock in the recruiting game. Really sucks.
sorry to break your nuts, but a random title win after years/decadeds of medocricy doesn't equate to instant recruiting prowess.
W
There were coaches at Duluth who could recruit?Where was I when this happened?
You serious right now? That's funny. I'm sure the gophers they past 3 years would have killed for Fontaine, either Connolly, Faulk, Mason Raymond, J.T. Brown (who was told by Lucia you're not good enough) and Stalock. All Rohlik recruits. But hey, guess those aren't recruits.
As for your logic on those other schools with titles, those don't hold water. Walking into a hour from a title 20 years old does nothing for you. But walking into a house with a recent title and new building should. How about some real discussion? And I'm the troll......
Hammy wrote:DrunkHockeyGuy wrote:You wonder sometimes if the bulldogs really won a title. Haven't landed a good recruit yet imho. I really feel our assistants since Rohlik can't hold his jock in the recruiting game. Really sucks.
I can't say I closely follow UMD's future depth chart for the next few years... have they already answered a healthy chunk of their needs? That certainly could be a part of it. I don't want to be too critical of any assistant's recruiting prowess because there are a lot of factors that go into it beyond how personable a guy is, etc. Although John Hill sucked IMO.![]()
Even with the recent glory, it is still a tough battle to beat traditional powers for recruits. Not saying it can't be done ever but it is a tough situation to navigate.
DrunkHockeyGuy wrote:Except the fact LeoPohl that you are talking a one player scenario. I named 5 players on a single seasons roster that I'm sure the gophers would have killed for. So your point is invalid.
DrunkHockeyGuy wrote:Except the fact LeoPohl that you are talking a one player scenario. I named 5 players on a single seasons roster that I'm sure the gophers would have killed for. So your point is invalid.
Ryan Cardinal wrote:He's saying Duluth was really good at it with their old assistant coach, but now that he's gone they are struggling.
beersong wrote:Do you even read what DHG writes or are you just out to rip on him? At least Hammy and Cardinal took the time to actually read his original post (which was ripping on UMD btw).
DrunkHockeyGuy wrote:You wonder sometimes if the bulldogs really won a title. Haven't landed a good recruit yet imho. I really feel our assistants since Rohlik can't hold his jock in the recruiting game. Really sucks.
beersong wrote:I don't think it's far-fetched to think that adding a brand new arena and a national title should at least maintain the level of recruits.
psych wrote:I agree...with DHG and Beersong?![]()
JDUBBS1280 wrote:Speaking of UMD, I have heard some rumors (just rumors) lately that they are close to landing a commitment from Vinni Lettieri. That would certainly be a good get for them if true.
LeoPohl wrote:JDUBBS1280 wrote:Speaking of UMD, I have heard some rumors (just rumors) lately that they are close to landing a commitment from Vinni Lettieri. That would certainly be a good get for them if true.
And according to Hammy, he's one to watch for Minnesota.Ahhhhh, recruiting season.
JDUBBS1280 wrote:LeoPohl wrote:JDUBBS1280 wrote:Speaking of UMD, I have heard some rumors (just rumors) lately that they are close to landing a commitment from Vinni Lettieri. That would certainly be a good get for them if true.
And according to Hammy, he's one to watch for Minnesota.Ahhhhh, recruiting season.
And as a source, I trust Hammy more. Hope he is right
[/quote][/quote]LeoPohl wrote: Nanne and the "M" just go together.
[/quote]Golden FE Ranger wrote:LeoPohl wrote: Nanne and the "M" just go together.
JDUBBS1280 wrote:That was Herb Brooks. And my understanding is that he didn't specifically tell him to play for UND. In short, he told Parise to go where he thought he had the best chance to win, and Parise thought that was UND.
Greyeagle wrote:JDUBBS1280 wrote:That was Herb Brooks. And my understanding is that he didn't specifically tell him to play for UND. In short, he told Parise to go where he thought he had the best chance to win, and Parise thought that was UND.
JDUBBS1280 wrote:Golden FE Ranger wrote:LeoPohl wrote: Nanne and the "M" just go together.Did not Sweet Lou from the Soo tell a certian Parise to go to ND?
That was Herb Brooks. And my understanding is that he didn't specifically tell him to play for UND. In short, he told Parise to go where he thought he had the best chance to win, and Parise thought that was UND.
LeoPohl wrote:Ryan Cardinal wrote:He's saying Duluth was really good at it with their old assistant coach, but now that he's gone they are struggling.
I'd contend his point on that. They got some good talent, but most schools do. Outside of the freshman class of '05-'06, it's hard to name a freshman class that stood out compared to the top programs.
He also seemed to imply that a national title should automatically make kids want to go there instead of someplace else.
Like because they had a good four game run to end the season sixteen year old kids are going to go "Yippee-cayou-cayay, Duluth is so good. Who wants to go to North Dakota or Minnesota when I can go to Duluth" after looking at an arena with few championship banners hanging in it and sign ten future NHLers in the five months since winning the title. Some people just have a hard time putting things into perspective. Winning the national title was a good thing for the program, but it did little to affect the landscape of college hockey, NCHA aside, which could play another factor in a potential recruit holding off on a commitment. Why would a top player commit to a program in today's climate when he doesn't have to?
centcougar07 wrote:LeoPohl wrote:Ryan Cardinal wrote:He's saying Duluth was really good at it with their old assistant coach, but now that he's gone they are struggling.
I'd contend his point on that. They got some good talent, but most schools do. Outside of the freshman class of '05-'06, it's hard to name a freshman class that stood out compared to the top programs.
He also seemed to imply that a national title should automatically make kids want to go there instead of someplace else.
Like because they had a good four game run to end the season sixteen year old kids are going to go "Yippee-cayou-cayay, Duluth is so good. Who wants to go to North Dakota or Minnesota when I can go to Duluth" after looking at an arena with few championship banners hanging in it and sign ten future NHLers in the five months since winning the title. Some people just have a hard time putting things into perspective. Winning the national title was a good thing for the program, but it did little to affect the landscape of college hockey, NCHA aside, which could play another factor in a potential recruit holding off on a commitment. Why would a top player commit to a program in today's climate when he doesn't have to?
You're an idiot if you say that winning a national title and having a brand new building does nothing for recruiting.
psych wrote:centcougar07 wrote:LeoPohl wrote:Ryan Cardinal wrote:He's saying Duluth was really good at it with their old assistant coach, but now that he's gone they are struggling.
I'd contend his point on that. They got some good talent, but most schools do. Outside of the freshman class of '05-'06, it's hard to name a freshman class that stood out compared to the top programs.
He also seemed to imply that a national title should automatically make kids want to go there instead of someplace else.
Like because they had a good four game run to end the season sixteen year old kids are going to go "Yippee-cayou-cayay, Duluth is so good. Who wants to go to North Dakota or Minnesota when I can go to Duluth" after looking at an arena with few championship banners hanging in it and sign ten future NHLers in the five months since winning the title. Some people just have a hard time putting things into perspective. Winning the national title was a good thing for the program, but it did little to affect the landscape of college hockey, NCHA aside, which could play another factor in a potential recruit holding off on a commitment. Why would a top player commit to a program in today's climate when he doesn't have to?
You're an idiot if you say that winning a national title and having a brand new building does nothing for recruiting.
But you've never met LeoPohl in person, so how can you accuse him of being an idiot?

centcougar07 wrote:LeoPohl wrote:Ryan Cardinal wrote:He's saying Duluth was really good at it with their old assistant coach, but now that he's gone they are struggling.
I'd contend his point on that. They got some good talent, but most schools do. Outside of the freshman class of '05-'06, it's hard to name a freshman class that stood out compared to the top programs.
He also seemed to imply that a national title should automatically make kids want to go there instead of someplace else.
Like because they had a good four game run to end the season sixteen year old kids are going to go "Yippee-cayou-cayay, Duluth is so good. Who wants to go to North Dakota or Minnesota when I can go to Duluth" after looking at an arena with few championship banners hanging in it and sign ten future NHLers in the five months since winning the title. Some people just have a hard time putting things into perspective. Winning the national title was a good thing for the program, but it did little to affect the landscape of college hockey, NCHA aside, which could play another factor in a potential recruit holding off on a commitment. Why would a top player commit to a program in today's climate when he doesn't have to?
You're an idiot if you say that winning a national title and having a brand new building does nothing for recruiting.
DrunkHockeyGuy wrote:A good "4 game run?" Wow, your distane for me is taking away your ability to be subjective at all. UMD was ranked #1 in the country for 3 weeks last year. I would say it was a hell of a season with a bad 8 game run in the middle and a bad Final 5 game. The rest of the season was great.
Beauner wrote:DrunkHockeyGuy wrote:A good "4 game run?" Wow, your distane for me is taking away your ability to be subjective at all. UMD was ranked #1 in the country for 3 weeks last year. I would say it was a hell of a season with a bad 8 game run in the middle and a bad Final 5 game. The rest of the season was great.
How dare you use logic like that! If you're not a Gopher it's a good 4 game run at the right time. Nothing more, nothing less. You know that.
Beauner wrote:DrunkHockeyGuy wrote:A good "4 game run?" Wow, your distane for me is taking away your ability to be subjective at all. UMD was ranked #1 in the country for 3 weeks last year. I would say it was a hell of a season with a bad 8 game run in the middle and a bad Final 5 game. The rest of the season was great.
How dare you use logic like that! If you're not a Gopher it's a good 4 game run at the right time. Nothing more, nothing less. You know that.

psych wrote:centcougar07 wrote:LeoPohl wrote:Ryan Cardinal wrote:He's saying Duluth was really good at it with their old assistant coach, but now that he's gone they are struggling.
I'd contend his point on that. They got some good talent, but most schools do. Outside of the freshman class of '05-'06, it's hard to name a freshman class that stood out compared to the top programs.
He also seemed to imply that a national title should automatically make kids want to go there instead of someplace else.
Like because they had a good four game run to end the season sixteen year old kids are going to go "Yippee-cayou-cayay, Duluth is so good. Who wants to go to North Dakota or Minnesota when I can go to Duluth" after looking at an arena with few championship banners hanging in it and sign ten future NHLers in the five months since winning the title. Some people just have a hard time putting things into perspective. Winning the national title was a good thing for the program, but it did little to affect the landscape of college hockey, NCHA aside, which could play another factor in a potential recruit holding off on a commitment. Why would a top player commit to a program in today's climate when he doesn't have to?
You're an idiot if you say that winning a national title and having a brand new building does nothing for recruiting.
But you've never met LeoPohl in person, so how can you accuse him of being an idiot?
centcougar07 wrote:LeoPohl wrote:Ryan Cardinal wrote:He's saying Duluth was really good at it with their old assistant coach, but now that he's gone they are struggling.
I'd contend his point on that. They got some good talent, but most schools do. Outside of the freshman class of '05-'06, it's hard to name a freshman class that stood out compared to the top programs.
He also seemed to imply that a national title should automatically make kids want to go there instead of someplace else.
Like because they had a good four game run to end the season sixteen year old kids are going to go "Yippee-cayou-cayay, Duluth is so good. Who wants to go to North Dakota or Minnesota when I can go to Duluth" after looking at an arena with few championship banners hanging in it and sign ten future NHLers in the five months since winning the title. Some people just have a hard time putting things into perspective. Winning the national title was a good thing for the program, but it did little to affect the landscape of college hockey, NCHA aside, which could play another factor in a potential recruit holding off on a commitment. Why would a top player commit to a program in today's climate when he doesn't have to?
You're an idiot if you say that winning a national title and having a brand new building does nothing for recruiting.
DrunkHockeyGuy wrote:centcougar07 wrote:LeoPohl wrote:Ryan Cardinal wrote:He's saying Duluth was really good at it with their old assistant coach, but now that he's gone they are struggling.
I'd contend his point on that. They got some good talent, but most schools do. Outside of the freshman class of '05-'06, it's hard to name a freshman class that stood out compared to the top programs.
He also seemed to imply that a national title should automatically make kids want to go there instead of someplace else.
Like because they had a good four game run to end the season sixteen year old kids are going to go "Yippee-cayou-cayay, Duluth is so good. Who wants to go to North Dakota or Minnesota when I can go to Duluth" after looking at an arena with few championship banners hanging in it and sign ten future NHLers in the five months since winning the title. Some people just have a hard time putting things into perspective. Winning the national title was a good thing for the program, but it did little to affect the landscape of college hockey, NCHA aside, which could play another factor in a potential recruit holding off on a commitment. Why would a top player commit to a program in today's climate when he doesn't have to?
You're an idiot if you say that winning a national title and having a brand new building does nothing for recruiting.
A good "4 game run?" Wow, your distane for me is taking away your ability to be subjective at all. UMD was ranked #1 in the country for 3 weeks last year. I would say it was a hell of a season with a bad 8 game run in the middle and a bad Final 5 game. The rest of the season was great.
LeoPohl wrote:DrunkHockeyGuy wrote:centcougar07 wrote:LeoPohl wrote:Ryan Cardinal wrote:He's saying Duluth was really good at it with their old assistant coach, but now that he's gone they are struggling.
I'd contend his point on that. They got some good talent, but most schools do. Outside of the freshman class of '05-'06, it's hard to name a freshman class that stood out compared to the top programs.
He also seemed to imply that a national title should automatically make kids want to go there instead of someplace else.
Like because they had a good four game run to end the season sixteen year old kids are going to go "Yippee-cayou-cayay, Duluth is so good. Who wants to go to North Dakota or Minnesota when I can go to Duluth" after looking at an arena with few championship banners hanging in it and sign ten future NHLers in the five months since winning the title. Some people just have a hard time putting things into perspective. Winning the national title was a good thing for the program, but it did little to affect the landscape of college hockey, NCHA aside, which could play another factor in a potential recruit holding off on a commitment. Why would a top player commit to a program in today's climate when he doesn't have to?
You're an idiot if you say that winning a national title and having a brand new building does nothing for recruiting.
A good "4 game run?" Wow, your distane for me is taking away your ability to be subjective at all. UMD was ranked #1 in the country for 3 weeks last year. I would say it was a hell of a season with a bad 8 game run in the middle and a bad Final 5 game. The rest of the season was great.
#1. Well, I'd hope I could be objective instead of subjective.
#2. You finished fourth in your own conference standings.
#3. You failed to win a game in the Final Five, losing to Bemidji.
#4. Your own coach said that you were lucky to start the season with all the overtime winners and without them your season could have been very different.
#5. Nobody outside your own fanbase thought that you were even the best team in your own conference last season because...
#6. ...the team everyone regarded as easily the best had a night of horrible luck and inexplicably lost the game before instead of facing you, a team that they treated as their own personal b!tch throughout the season, for the championship.
Fan Club - Est. 9/15/2010DrunkHockeyGuy wrote:Wow, a whole 2 points, 1 win from 2nd place. I know, 4th place is horrible when seperated by one win! Watch out, only 1st plae teams are good I guess!
Of course our coach said we were LUCKY to win OT games, every coach says that to not give other teams bulletin board material. Wake up and follow a press conference once in a while.
Wait, we lost the play in game at the Final 5?!?!?!? Because that never happens in a 1 and done scenario.
Honeslty maybe Jup can change your name to "pohlsmoker" because you smoke some good stuff at your place!
No matter how bad a team you are playing may be, teams still lose those games. The good teams find a way to not lose those games. I.E Northeaster, Vermont, Tech at home....shall I keep going?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest