Consumer Research

Open Forum (Except Sports)..... Let's keep politics & religion talk out of here please.

Re: Consumer Research

Postby streakygopher » Tue 6/19/12 9:58 pm

gopheritall wrote:
davescharf wrote:
streakygopher wrote:Anybody know anything about the Microsoft Surface? This is a gushing review....

http://gizmodo.com/5919521/microsoft-surface-just-made-the-macbook-air-and-the-ipad-obsolete


If they price it @ $800 or $900 and it has a 6-7 hour battery life then Apple has no worries IMO.

If I can run Windows based business applications on this for 6 hours for $900 then Apple does have something to worry about. The iPad is still little more than a large phone. This could up the ante and Apple no longer has (in my opinion) the single most important piece of their strategy (Jobs). I have an iPad and like it BUT it has many limitations and a retina display doesn't make a revolution. If Microsoft does this right it could expose the iPad as a toy (which it is). The iPad does not have the inner workings to run a business application and Apple can't shove their full OS on it and make it viable. Microsoft can because everyone wants their Microsoft applications on their iPad. Microsoft has the chance to give them that.


This is the point that stuck a little with me. If this thing is a tool and not a toy it should get a lot of interest from the business community. If business folks can tuck this under their arms and operate it like a laptop this could get a lot of interest fast. I don't know too much about interconnecting a device to machine tools like a laptop can do, but since it's Windows and most machine tools are Windows driven, I would think that would be another terrific application...long hours on the shop floor, easy mobility, no cords.
Last edited by streakygopher on Tue 6/19/12 10:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
streakygopher
Addict
 
Posts: 8197
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Thu 12/30/04 10:49 am
Location: anywhere but the middle of the road

Re: Consumer Research

Postby dxmnkd316 » Tue 6/19/12 10:03 pm

Yeah, but the thing working against the Microsoft tablet is Windows itself. Windows 8 has received a very chilly response so far. I'm thinking the success of the tablet hinges almost entirely on the success of Windows 8 (and perhaps vice versa). Microsoft is using this tablet as a launching pad for Windows 8.

I can see the great possibilities, but Windows 8 is going to be almost impossible to sell to the corporate world because of the Metro interface. Surely a warning sign.
The name on the front of the jersey is more important than the name on the back -H.Brooks

st8ofhockey: Is that a photocollage of a dick? Oh wait, that's Patrick Stewart

psych: haha, damnit dx, your phone is drunk again
dxmnkd316: f*** you, I can't stop any time I want
dxmnkd316: err wait

I don't think I'm always right. I just find it hard to operate on the opposite assumption.
Disclaimer: 95% of the things I post are jokes, sarcasm, or hyperbole. Thanks in advance for not taking things so literally
User avatar
dxmnkd316
Post Whore
 
Posts: 15286 • Age: 28
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sun 10/09/05 4:24 am
Location: Oakdale

Re: Consumer Research

Postby gopheritall » Tue 6/19/12 10:24 pm

Kelor wrote:We are within days of introducing the iPad to 110 of our workers. I can imagine that many other businesses have already made the leap. Once the leap has been made, it will be a long long time before Microsoft gets these clients back.

I'm sure they aren't too late, but they sure aren't on time. I'm excited that apple will have a serious competitor.

What are they doing with the iPads? What industry are you in?
gopheritall
Golden
 
Posts: 969 • Age: 45
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Thu 3/25/04 11:09 am
Location: Maple Grove, MN

Re: Consumer Research

Postby Kelor » Tue 6/19/12 11:24 pm

gopheritall wrote:
Kelor wrote:We are within days of introducing the iPad to 110 of our workers. I can imagine that many other businesses have already made the leap. Once the leap has been made, it will be a long long time before Microsoft gets these clients back.

I'm sure they aren't too late, but they sure aren't on time. I'm excited that apple will have a serious competitor.

What are they doing with the iPads? What industry are you in?


It's our sales force. This is a big move and we know there are serious compatibility issues, but here we go....
Kelor
Golden
 
Posts: 2691
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sat 2/12/05 8:19 pm

Re: Consumer Research

Postby davescharf » Wed 6/20/12 6:03 am

Kelor wrote:
gopheritall wrote:
Kelor wrote:We are within days of introducing the iPad to 110 of our workers. I can imagine that many other businesses have already made the leap. Once the leap has been made, it will be a long long time before Microsoft gets these clients back.

I'm sure they aren't too late, but they sure aren't on time. I'm excited that apple will have a serious competitor.

What are they doing with the iPads? What industry are you in?


It's our sales force. This is a big move and we know there are serious compatibility issues, but here we go....


We literally have thousands of them deployed and have multiple apps to support the ones in the field. I would argue that in the eyes of those who have one it's a little more than a toy.

I use Pages and Numbers quite a bit for things I'm involved with outside of work. If I can spend $400 for the iPad (or even $500) and spend less than $50 on apps to do things productive, that's still a challenge Microsoft will have. Microsoft has one shot to get this right or they'll be just another competitor.
Member of the "Never used the 'ahh' smiley" in a post since September 2010.
User avatar
davescharf
Golden
 
Posts: 2835 • Age: 37
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Fri 2/11/05 7:22 am
Location: Back at the End of the Season Ticket waiting list..wherever that might be

Re: Consumer Research

Postby greydogg » Wed 6/20/12 8:32 am

davescharf wrote:
streakygopher wrote:Anybody know anything about the Microsoft Surface? This is a gushing review....

http://gizmodo.com/5919521/microsoft-surface-just-made-the-macbook-air-and-the-ipad-obsolete


If they price it @ $800 or $900 and it has a 6-7 hour battery life then Apple has no worries IMO.


I really don't think Microsoft will price the device higher than the iPad, if they do what they did with the Xbox they will price the device $50-100 dollars cheaper to get their market foothold established. I knew this was coming from MS and I was waiting to see what it was before I thought about buying a tablet. I now know that I will give this the best look before I make my decision (based on my home computer network setup is used and for my job). RT model will be comparable to iPad performance wise but the Intel Ivy Bridge model will knock the doors off the iPad.
Married a Whoiux Fan........
User avatar
greydogg
Golden
 
Posts: 375 • Age: 33
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Mon 1/21/08 11:17 am

Re: Consumer Research

Postby rowshkex » Wed 6/20/12 9:12 am

I'd make a serious consideration of this if it synced well with Outlook, etc... I fully utilize the task list in Outlook's calendar, and the iPhone doesn't know how any of that works for some reason, and Apple apparently can't figure out how to implement it...
is rice chex.
is not Raphael.
is not quite Rau.
is not a hockey mind.
is a 1 time GPL Pick 'Em Weekly Non-Winner Tiebreaker Champion.
User avatar
rowshkex
Super Vet
 
Posts: 2497
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Wed 2/23/11 6:07 am
Location: South Minneapolis

Re: Consumer Research

Postby george » Wed 6/20/12 11:52 am

We have issues with synching either Android or ipads with our network right now. I am planning to wait for the MS tablet in hopes it will play better with my work network.
User avatar
george
Golden
 
Posts: 1996
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Wed 4/09/03 11:14 am
Location: Edina

Re: Consumer Research

Postby cavedog » Wed 6/20/12 12:34 pm

The Zune was supposed to be a hot seller too...
User avatar
cavedog
Golden
 
Posts: 969
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Fri 2/18/05 6:09 pm
Location: Champlin, MN

Re: Consumer Research

Postby Jupiter » Wed 6/20/12 12:36 pm

cavedog wrote:The Zune was supposed to be a hot seller too...

Don't like how GPL is run? Get your own site if you don't like it!
Stop using Internet Explorer, it's for your own good!
User avatar
Jupiter
The Bringer of Jollity
 
Posts: 11086 • Age: 40
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Wed 4/09/03 10:45 am
Location: The Sticks

Re: Consumer Research

Postby Chris Eckes » Thu 6/21/12 12:38 pm

So I just switched my wireless plan to a plan that I can actually afford to have a smart phone on. Anyone have any recommendations? I'm through Page Plus wireless now, and I think they can port Verizon phones onto their network. I would like a non-iPhone smartphone. Whaddya think?

EDIT: I've been looking at the Droid X... any thoughts about that one?
Formerly known as The X Factor
Gopher Hockey: Minnesota's Pride on Ice
National Champions: 1974, 1976, 1979, 2002, 2003

Pride on Ice Blog: http://prideoniceblog.blogspot.com (click on the ads!)
Founding Member of the :ahhh: Fan Club - Est. 9/15/2010
2010 GPL Fantasy Baseball Champion
User avatar
Chris Eckes
Golden
 
Posts: 3882 • Age: 25
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Fri 3/02/07 9:04 pm
Location: S1, R1 (until 2012-2013...)

Re: Consumer Research

Postby Handyman » Thu 6/21/12 1:15 pm

The Droid X is a good phone, but I hate MotoBlur (the Motorola Launcher) so I would never buy a Motorola again. If there is an HTC phone you can port like the Incredible 2 I would go with that over the Droid but I fully admit i am an HTC fanboy. (who is stuck with the Samsung Galaxy s2 right now and wants to cry about it)
If you disagree with me, that is aok by me :) :dup:

Another member of the "Never used the 'ahh' smiley" in a post since September 2010.

My name is not Dan...I am however a prick!
Handyman
Needs help
 
Posts: 11135 • Age: 33
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Mon 4/14/03 12:24 am
Location: Minneapolis

Re: Consumer Research

Postby Chris Eckes » Thu 6/21/12 2:13 pm

What do you think of the Incredible 1? Looks like there are a few of those floating around for a reasonable price...
Formerly known as The X Factor
Gopher Hockey: Minnesota's Pride on Ice
National Champions: 1974, 1976, 1979, 2002, 2003

Pride on Ice Blog: http://prideoniceblog.blogspot.com (click on the ads!)
Founding Member of the :ahhh: Fan Club - Est. 9/15/2010
2010 GPL Fantasy Baseball Champion
User avatar
Chris Eckes
Golden
 
Posts: 3882 • Age: 25
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Fri 3/02/07 9:04 pm
Location: S1, R1 (until 2012-2013...)

Re: Consumer Research

Postby Handyman » Fri 6/22/12 11:36 am

I have played around with the Incredible 1, it is a solid phone though I think the specs are probably a bit outdated. I guess it all depends what you need it for. If you just plan to do the basics it should be fine. If you want to get like 500 apps and do high end stuff you might need to go a generation higher.

When the money scenario is better for me the HTC Evo LTE (Sprint) will be mine. My buddy has one and the thing is like heaven. :)
If you disagree with me, that is aok by me :) :dup:

Another member of the "Never used the 'ahh' smiley" in a post since September 2010.

My name is not Dan...I am however a prick!
Handyman
Needs help
 
Posts: 11135 • Age: 33
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Mon 4/14/03 12:24 am
Location: Minneapolis

Re: Consumer Research

Postby skiier32 » Fri 6/22/12 2:29 pm

Handyman wrote:I have played around with the Incredible 1, it is a solid phone though I think the specs are probably a bit outdated. I guess it all depends what you need it for. If you just plan to do the basics it should be fine. If you want to get like 500 apps and do high end stuff you might need to go a generation higher.

When the money scenario is better for me the HTC Evo LTE (Sprint) will be mine. My buddy has one and the thing is like heaven. :)


When I have a line on my plan that has an upgrade I will also be getting the Evo LTE!!
User avatar
skiier32
Golden
 
Posts: 488 • Age: 39
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Fri 11/19/04 12:31 pm
Location: Sitting in Section 10

Re: Consumer Research

Postby Handyman » Sat 6/23/12 5:19 pm

I miss my old Evo 4G...that phone was better than my laptop and I had it tweaked so awesome it outperformed even the next generation of phones and half the tablets. (especially anything from the "I" line) If I had known I would have just gotten another one of those instead of upgrading to the Galaxy which has better specs but is not nearly as fun or customizable. the LTE will be mine!
If you disagree with me, that is aok by me :) :dup:

Another member of the "Never used the 'ahh' smiley" in a post since September 2010.

My name is not Dan...I am however a prick!
Handyman
Needs help
 
Posts: 11135 • Age: 33
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Mon 4/14/03 12:24 am
Location: Minneapolis

Re: Consumer Research

Postby rowshkex » Tue 6/26/12 2:30 pm

Simple coffee makers. Go.
is rice chex.
is not Raphael.
is not quite Rau.
is not a hockey mind.
is a 1 time GPL Pick 'Em Weekly Non-Winner Tiebreaker Champion.
User avatar
rowshkex
Super Vet
 
Posts: 2497
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Wed 2/23/11 6:07 am
Location: South Minneapolis

Re: Consumer Research

Postby PrideOnIce » Tue 6/26/12 3:11 pm

rowshkex wrote:Simple coffee makers. Go.

A guy I once worked with would just eat the roasted whole beans.
Friedrich August von Hayek, 1899-1992 Milton Friedman 1912-2006
Prophetic - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pW_FXjbt6wY&feature=related
The "Intellectuals" speak - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBrHkxqNT7s&feature=player_embedded
Evergreen, Solyndra, LightSquared, Fast and Furious, $16 Muffin, Halliburton, Siga Technologies, Solar Trust for America
User avatar
PrideOnIce
Golden
 
Posts: 1279
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Fri 2/11/05 7:12 pm
Location: Obamanation:Socialist St of Marx, Lenin, Hitler, FDR, Wilson, Franken, Wellstone and Social Justice.

Re: Consumer Research

Postby rowshkex » Tue 6/26/12 3:14 pm

PrideOnIce wrote:
rowshkex wrote:Simple coffee makers. Go.

A guy I once worked with would just eat the roasted whole beans.


D***it, why didn't I think of that?!? But seriously, coffee beans taste good.
is rice chex.
is not Raphael.
is not quite Rau.
is not a hockey mind.
is a 1 time GPL Pick 'Em Weekly Non-Winner Tiebreaker Champion.
User avatar
rowshkex
Super Vet
 
Posts: 2497
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Wed 2/23/11 6:07 am
Location: South Minneapolis

Re: Consumer Research

Postby Slap Shot » Tue 6/26/12 3:55 pm

PrideOnIce wrote:
rowshkex wrote:Simple coffee makers. Go.

A guy I once worked with would just eat the roasted whole beans.


Bill Braskie?
User avatar
Slap Shot
Legend
 
Posts: 6288
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sat 5/14/05 9:01 pm
Location: Brooklyn Park

Re: Consumer Research

Postby dxmnkd316 » Tue 6/26/12 8:08 pm

Mr. Coffee four-cup drip. Done.
The name on the front of the jersey is more important than the name on the back -H.Brooks

st8ofhockey: Is that a photocollage of a dick? Oh wait, that's Patrick Stewart

psych: haha, damnit dx, your phone is drunk again
dxmnkd316: f*** you, I can't stop any time I want
dxmnkd316: err wait

I don't think I'm always right. I just find it hard to operate on the opposite assumption.
Disclaimer: 95% of the things I post are jokes, sarcasm, or hyperbole. Thanks in advance for not taking things so literally
User avatar
dxmnkd316
Post Whore
 
Posts: 15286 • Age: 28
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sun 10/09/05 4:24 am
Location: Oakdale

Re: Consumer Research

Postby rowshkex » Tue 6/26/12 11:45 pm

Bought the Mr. Coffee 12-cupper. We'll see what happens!
is rice chex.
is not Raphael.
is not quite Rau.
is not a hockey mind.
is a 1 time GPL Pick 'Em Weekly Non-Winner Tiebreaker Champion.
User avatar
rowshkex
Super Vet
 
Posts: 2497
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Wed 2/23/11 6:07 am
Location: South Minneapolis

Re: Consumer Research

Postby george » Wed 6/27/12 7:28 am

rowshkex wrote:Bought the Mr. Coffee 12-cupper. We'll see what happens!


I recommend not drinking it all at one sitting. If you do, please be sure to come on here and post results.
User avatar
george
Golden
 
Posts: 1996
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Wed 4/09/03 11:14 am
Location: Edina

Re: Consumer Research

Postby dxmnkd316 » Wed 6/27/12 7:32 am

A buddy and I once came close to each drinking 100 (small) cups of coffee in 48 hours. Before we did this, we had to figure out how fast the body metabolizes caffeine to make sure we didn't actually die.
The name on the front of the jersey is more important than the name on the back -H.Brooks

st8ofhockey: Is that a photocollage of a dick? Oh wait, that's Patrick Stewart

psych: haha, damnit dx, your phone is drunk again
dxmnkd316: f*** you, I can't stop any time I want
dxmnkd316: err wait

I don't think I'm always right. I just find it hard to operate on the opposite assumption.
Disclaimer: 95% of the things I post are jokes, sarcasm, or hyperbole. Thanks in advance for not taking things so literally
User avatar
dxmnkd316
Post Whore
 
Posts: 15286 • Age: 28
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sun 10/09/05 4:24 am
Location: Oakdale

Re: Consumer Research

Postby Zwak » Wed 6/27/12 7:55 am

rowshkex wrote:Simple coffee makers. Go.


I don't drink coffee but my wife does so I bought her a Keurig single brew machine. She loves it. There are tons of different coffees to choose from and she likes the convenience of just a cup at a time.

Word of caution, if one is considering one of these, make sure your normal coffee mug fits underneath the dispenser. My wife uses a travel mug so I had to get a her a bigger machine so it would fit under it.
GPL's official source of trivia.
User avatar
Zwak
Golden
 
Posts: 6595 • Age: 47
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Mon 11/13/06 7:09 pm
Location: South St. Paul

Re: Consumer Research

Postby rowshkex » Wed 6/27/12 8:50 am

george wrote:
rowshkex wrote:Bought the Mr. Coffee 12-cupper. We'll see what happens!


I recommend not drinking it all at one sitting. If you do, please be sure to come on here and post results.


Hopefully I can just brew a 4-cup batch in this thing until I get married or need 12 cups a day... Whichever comes first.
is rice chex.
is not Raphael.
is not quite Rau.
is not a hockey mind.
is a 1 time GPL Pick 'Em Weekly Non-Winner Tiebreaker Champion.
User avatar
rowshkex
Super Vet
 
Posts: 2497
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Wed 2/23/11 6:07 am
Location: South Minneapolis

Re: Consumer Research

Postby Golden FE Ranger » Wed 6/27/12 2:46 pm

rowshkex wrote:
george wrote:
rowshkex wrote:Bought the Mr. Coffee 12-cupper. We'll see what happens!


I recommend not drinking it all at one sitting. If you do, please be sure to come on here and post results.


Hopefully I can just brew a 4-cup batch in this thing until I get married or need 12 cups a day... Whichever comes first.


You May need the 12 cups prior, but after there should be plenty of time for sleep... Until the little ones show up.
President GWB said, "And it seems like Minnesota is pretty good at hockey, too."

"I think in the best interest of his career, he definitely would benefit from playing one more year of college," Gretzky said.


"Playing well is not good enough, winning is good enough." Doug Woog 2/27/10
User avatar
Golden FE Ranger
Golden
 
Posts: 5514 • Age: 37
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Thu 4/13/06 1:59 pm
Location: Section 7

Re: Consumer Research

Postby The Rube » Wed 6/27/12 9:52 pm

dxmnkd316 wrote:A buddy and I once came close to each drinking 100 (small) cups of coffee in 48 hours. Before we did this, we had to figure out how fast the body metabolizes caffeine to make sure we didn't actually die.



It's more than 6 pots of Perkins coffee, between two people, in a (approx) 5 hour sitting. However, your body will hate you afterwards. :oops:
Also known as Brenthoven on USCHO.
User avatar
The Rube
Golden
 
Posts: 7628
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sun 4/10/05 11:01 am
Location: Chez Rube

Re: Consumer Research

Postby MNGophers29 » Thu 6/28/12 12:46 am

Zwak wrote:
rowshkex wrote:Simple coffee makers. Go.


I don't drink coffee but my wife does so I bought her a Keurig single brew machine. She loves it. There are tons of different coffees to choose from and she likes the convenience of just a cup at a time.

Word of caution, if one is considering one of these, make sure your normal coffee mug fits underneath the dispenser. My wife uses a travel mug so I had to get a her a bigger machine so it would fit under it.

Same problem here, but depending on what one you bought, you can remove the spill collector and gain about 2 inches of clearance.

This coffee stuff got me thinking about my ex-brother-in-law and you used to use a french press and spend about an hour making a cup of coffee. I am not a coffee drinker so I may not understand why people drink coffee, but I am guessing it is something used to get the body going in the AM? I don't have time to spend an hour on much of anything, much less a damn cup of coffe...damn coffee snob!
"Hard work will beat talent, if talent doesn't work hard"
Doug Woog - 1990

This quote was written on the chalkboard in a lockeroom in the old Ralph Engelstad arena my Squirt team used the day after the Gophers used it and came into the game ranked #1 in the nation and lost 6-1 to a second rate Sioux team.

Overhead on SiouxSports.com - Why does every thread always turn into a "Gopher" thread? Is there a secret infatuation with them?
User avatar
MNGophers29
Veteran
 
Posts: 690 • Age: 34
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sun 12/31/06 12:24 am
Location: Fargo via Grand Rapids, Bemidji, Madison WI, East Grand Forks.

Re: Consumer Research

Postby rowshkex » Thu 6/28/12 8:17 am

MNGophers29 wrote:
Zwak wrote:
rowshkex wrote:Simple coffee makers. Go.


I don't drink coffee but my wife does so I bought her a Keurig single brew machine. She loves it. There are tons of different coffees to choose from and she likes the convenience of just a cup at a time.

Word of caution, if one is considering one of these, make sure your normal coffee mug fits underneath the dispenser. My wife uses a travel mug so I had to get a her a bigger machine so it would fit under it.

Same problem here, but depending on what one you bought, you can remove the spill collector and gain about 2 inches of clearance.

This coffee stuff got me thinking about my ex-brother-in-law and you used to use a french press and spend about an hour making a cup of coffee. I am not a coffee drinker so I may not understand why people drink coffee, but I am guessing it is something used to get the body going in the AM? I don't have time to spend an hour on much of anything, much less a damn cup of coffe...damn coffee snob!


An hour to make French press...??? :confused2: :confused2: :confused2:
is rice chex.
is not Raphael.
is not quite Rau.
is not a hockey mind.
is a 1 time GPL Pick 'Em Weekly Non-Winner Tiebreaker Champion.
User avatar
rowshkex
Super Vet
 
Posts: 2497
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Wed 2/23/11 6:07 am
Location: South Minneapolis

Re: Consumer Research

Postby MNGophers29 » Thu 6/28/12 10:34 am

rowshkex wrote:
MNGophers29 wrote:
Zwak wrote:
rowshkex wrote:Simple coffee makers. Go.


I don't drink coffee but my wife does so I bought her a Keurig single brew machine. She loves it. There are tons of different coffees to choose from and she likes the convenience of just a cup at a time.

Word of caution, if one is considering one of these, make sure your normal coffee mug fits underneath the dispenser. My wife uses a travel mug so I had to get a her a bigger machine so it would fit under it.

Same problem here, but depending on what one you bought, you can remove the spill collector and gain about 2 inches of clearance.

This coffee stuff got me thinking about my ex-brother-in-law and you used to use a french press and spend about an hour making a cup of coffee. I am not a coffee drinker so I may not understand why people drink coffee, but I am guessing it is something used to get the body going in the AM? I don't have time to spend an hour on much of anything, much less a damn cup of coffe...damn coffee snob!

An hour to make French press...??? :confused2: :confused2: :confused2:
:lol: Yeah, I have no idea, I know that he was screwing around in the kitchen long after the rest of the people that drank coffee had theirs and were almost done. Not a coffee drinker so I have no idea what a french press is..
"Hard work will beat talent, if talent doesn't work hard"
Doug Woog - 1990

This quote was written on the chalkboard in a lockeroom in the old Ralph Engelstad arena my Squirt team used the day after the Gophers used it and came into the game ranked #1 in the nation and lost 6-1 to a second rate Sioux team.

Overhead on SiouxSports.com - Why does every thread always turn into a "Gopher" thread? Is there a secret infatuation with them?
User avatar
MNGophers29
Veteran
 
Posts: 690 • Age: 34
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sun 12/31/06 12:24 am
Location: Fargo via Grand Rapids, Bemidji, Madison WI, East Grand Forks.

Re: Consumer Research

Postby cavedog » Thu 6/28/12 12:10 pm

Zwak wrote:
rowshkex wrote:Simple coffee makers. Go.


I don't drink coffee but my wife does so I bought her a Keurig single brew machine. She loves it. There are tons of different coffees to choose from and she likes the convenience of just a cup at a time.

Word of caution, if one is considering one of these, make sure your normal coffee mug fits underneath the dispenser. My wife uses a travel mug so I had to get a her a bigger machine so it would fit under it.


I recently did some research on Keurig machines before buying one for my wife for Mother's Day. She absolutely loves it and I've been using it a fair amount too. The coffee is better than when I use our Mr. Coffee 10 cup. I bought the small office model from Office Max for 130. I guess it uses commercial quality pump and lasts longer than the models you find elsewhere. Those k cups get a little expensive but I guess with convenience comes extra cost...
User avatar
cavedog
Golden
 
Posts: 969
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Fri 2/18/05 6:09 pm
Location: Champlin, MN

Re: Consumer Research

Postby dxmnkd316 » Thu 6/28/12 1:01 pm

The Keurig machines get a bad reputation because people don't understand that when you have hard water, the lines can clog up and cause the pump to wear out sooner. Even mildly hard water can be a big issue.
The name on the front of the jersey is more important than the name on the back -H.Brooks

st8ofhockey: Is that a photocollage of a dick? Oh wait, that's Patrick Stewart

psych: haha, damnit dx, your phone is drunk again
dxmnkd316: f*** you, I can't stop any time I want
dxmnkd316: err wait

I don't think I'm always right. I just find it hard to operate on the opposite assumption.
Disclaimer: 95% of the things I post are jokes, sarcasm, or hyperbole. Thanks in advance for not taking things so literally
User avatar
dxmnkd316
Post Whore
 
Posts: 15286 • Age: 28
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sun 10/09/05 4:24 am
Location: Oakdale

Re: Consumer Research

Postby george » Thu 6/28/12 3:57 pm

cavedog wrote:
Zwak wrote:
rowshkex wrote:Simple coffee makers. Go.


I don't drink coffee but my wife does so I bought her a Keurig single brew machine. She loves it. There are tons of different coffees to choose from and she likes the convenience of just a cup at a time.

Word of caution, if one is considering one of these, make sure your normal coffee mug fits underneath the dispenser. My wife uses a travel mug so I had to get a her a bigger machine so it would fit under it.


I recently did some research on Keurig machines before buying one for my wife for Mother's Day. She absolutely loves it and I've been using it a fair amount too. The coffee is better than when I use our Mr. Coffee 10 cup. I bought the small office model from Office Max for 130. I guess it uses commercial quality pump and lasts longer than the models you find elsewhere. Those k cups get a little expensive but I guess with convenience comes extra cost...


I saw that someone has refillable cups for them.
User avatar
george
Golden
 
Posts: 1996
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Wed 4/09/03 11:14 am
Location: Edina

Re: Consumer Research

Postby cavedog » Thu 6/28/12 5:13 pm

dxmnkd316 wrote:The Keurig machines get a bad reputation because people don't understand that when you have hard water, the lines can clog up and cause the pump to wear out sooner. Even mildly hard water can be a big issue.


True dat. We only use distilled water in ours...
User avatar
cavedog
Golden
 
Posts: 969
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Fri 2/18/05 6:09 pm
Location: Champlin, MN

Re: Consumer Research

Postby Tee09 » Thu 6/28/12 5:16 pm

cavedog wrote:
dxmnkd316 wrote:The Keurig machines get a bad reputation because people don't understand that when you have hard water, the lines can clog up and cause the pump to wear out sooner. Even mildly hard water can be a big issue.


True dat. We only use distilled water in ours...


So...If I really want to buy a reverse osmosis water system, I can tell my wife it's for her coffee maker? SCORE!
User avatar
Tee09
Golden
 
Posts: 3926
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Mon 1/15/07 9:40 pm

Re: Consumer Research

Postby dxmnkd316 » Thu 6/28/12 5:18 pm

RO systems are great, but don't forget the annual costs associated with membrane and pre-filter replacements.
The name on the front of the jersey is more important than the name on the back -H.Brooks

st8ofhockey: Is that a photocollage of a dick? Oh wait, that's Patrick Stewart

psych: haha, damnit dx, your phone is drunk again
dxmnkd316: f*** you, I can't stop any time I want
dxmnkd316: err wait

I don't think I'm always right. I just find it hard to operate on the opposite assumption.
Disclaimer: 95% of the things I post are jokes, sarcasm, or hyperbole. Thanks in advance for not taking things so literally
User avatar
dxmnkd316
Post Whore
 
Posts: 15286 • Age: 28
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sun 10/09/05 4:24 am
Location: Oakdale

Re: Consumer Research

Postby Tee09 » Thu 6/28/12 5:24 pm

dxmnkd316 wrote:RO systems are great, but don't forget the annual costs associated with membrane and pre-filter replacements.


They aren't terrible, but I have to wait to get into a real house with a real job first.
User avatar
Tee09
Golden
 
Posts: 3926
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Mon 1/15/07 9:40 pm

Re: Consumer Research

Postby cavedog » Thu 6/28/12 5:27 pm

I'd love to know what the costs are for purchase/install and maintenance. We spend a fair amount of money on bottled and distilled h2o...
User avatar
cavedog
Golden
 
Posts: 969
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Fri 2/18/05 6:09 pm
Location: Champlin, MN

Re: Consumer Research

Postby dxmnkd316 » Thu 6/28/12 5:35 pm

I was looking at putting one in last year when I bought my house. Just an under-the-sink model. I want to say it was something like $$300 for the system and another $250-$300 a year for membranes and filters.
The name on the front of the jersey is more important than the name on the back -H.Brooks

st8ofhockey: Is that a photocollage of a dick? Oh wait, that's Patrick Stewart

psych: haha, damnit dx, your phone is drunk again
dxmnkd316: f*** you, I can't stop any time I want
dxmnkd316: err wait

I don't think I'm always right. I just find it hard to operate on the opposite assumption.
Disclaimer: 95% of the things I post are jokes, sarcasm, or hyperbole. Thanks in advance for not taking things so literally
User avatar
dxmnkd316
Post Whore
 
Posts: 15286 • Age: 28
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sun 10/09/05 4:24 am
Location: Oakdale

Re: Consumer Research

Postby The Rube » Thu 6/28/12 10:26 pm

Water is free, people!!!!!!!!


(yeah ok, it's under utilities, but you get my point) :lol:
Also known as Brenthoven on USCHO.
User avatar
The Rube
Golden
 
Posts: 7628
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sun 4/10/05 11:01 am
Location: Chez Rube

Re: Consumer Research

Postby george » Fri 6/29/12 7:51 am

cavedog wrote:I'd love to know what the costs are for purchase/install and maintenance. We spend a fair amount of money on bottled and distilled h2o...


Jebus, you must have really bad water there. Our Edina water is notoriously hard and, in my opinion, they way over-chlorinate it. We make do just fine with a conventional softener and a small final filter (particulate and activated charcoal for taste/chlorine)on the cold water tap in the kitchen. RO seems overkill unless you have really bad incoming water or some serious need for high purity (I specify them for sterilizer systems, labs and some steam generation systems).
User avatar
george
Golden
 
Posts: 1996
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Wed 4/09/03 11:14 am
Location: Edina

Re: Consumer Research

Postby Tee09 » Fri 6/29/12 9:03 am

My interest would be for a hobby where I need a really low conductivity. I don't mind the taste of the chlorinated chalk/water mix we have here, but lugging distilled water back from work or the store gets old fast.
User avatar
Tee09
Golden
 
Posts: 3926
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Mon 1/15/07 9:40 pm

Re: Consumer Research

Postby Idontknow » Fri 6/29/12 2:10 pm

Has anyone here tried BoostMobile? I'm still on a basic phone and near the end of my contract. I don't really use my phone that much so I hate to spend upwards of $100/month on a cell phone. I am getting tired of telling my friends not to text me though (right now it's 20 cents a text). With Boost I could get a smartphone and have unlimited everything for $55/mo. initially and $40/mo. after 18 months. I know with pre-paid the big downsides are buying your phone upfront and no roaming. I think I can deal with that, but my question is more about their signal in the city and any customer service issues people have had. (I know most cell phone companies have customer service issues though)
User avatar
Idontknow
Golden
 
Posts: 445
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Tue 12/20/05 11:41 am

Re: Consumer Research

Postby dxmnkd316 » Fri 6/29/12 4:33 pm

Tee09 wrote:My interest would be for a hobby where I need a really low conductivity. I don't mind the taste of the chlorinated chalk/water mix we have here, but lugging distilled water back from work or the store gets old fast.


18.3 MOhm FTW!
The name on the front of the jersey is more important than the name on the back -H.Brooks

st8ofhockey: Is that a photocollage of a dick? Oh wait, that's Patrick Stewart

psych: haha, damnit dx, your phone is drunk again
dxmnkd316: f*** you, I can't stop any time I want
dxmnkd316: err wait

I don't think I'm always right. I just find it hard to operate on the opposite assumption.
Disclaimer: 95% of the things I post are jokes, sarcasm, or hyperbole. Thanks in advance for not taking things so literally
User avatar
dxmnkd316
Post Whore
 
Posts: 15286 • Age: 28
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sun 10/09/05 4:24 am
Location: Oakdale

Re: Consumer Research

Postby cavedog » Fri 6/29/12 6:06 pm

george wrote:
cavedog wrote:I'd love to know what the costs are for purchase/install and maintenance. We spend a fair amount of money on bottled and distilled h2o...


Jebus, you must have really bad water there. Our Edina water is notoriously hard and, in my opinion, they way over-chlorinate it. We make do just fine with a conventional softener and a small final filter (particulate and activated charcoal for taste/chlorine)on the cold water tap in the kitchen. RO seems overkill unless you have really bad incoming water or some serious need for high purity (I specify them for sterilizer systems, labs and some steam generation systems).


Yes, water is awful out here in Sherburne Co.
User avatar
cavedog
Golden
 
Posts: 969
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Fri 2/18/05 6:09 pm
Location: Champlin, MN

Re: Consumer Research

Postby HockeyBum » Fri 6/29/12 10:38 pm

St. Croix Tree Service is on my s**t list. We lost some trees in the storm a few weeks ago. We cut up the trees ourselves and piled them on the curb. I asked them to pick up the debris and remove the stump. I realize they are probably busy, but it took them over a week to pick up the stuff from the curb, and they left the stump.

Some guy came back today and ground out the stump, but he left an enormous pile of dirt, wood chips, and roots behind. I contacted St. Croix Tree to complain that they didn't remove the debris and smooth it out. Apparently they charge extra for that, which they never told me about. I guess I just assumed that was part of the deal. Had I known that, I wouldn't have bothered to have it done. So now I've got a bill and a big mess to clean up tomorrow. :x
User avatar
HockeyBum
Golden
 
Posts: 2026
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Thu 6/03/04 12:28 pm
Location: Woodbury

Re: Consumer Research

Postby cavedog » Wed 7/04/12 8:24 pm

Any TV/Home Theatre experts out there?

I need to buy a new hdtv for our lower level family room (controlled lighting - even during the middle of the day), keeping the size between 46-55" and the price around 800-1000. The TV will be used for mostly TV, movies, and some gaming in a new home 5.1 home theatre setup. I'm looking for the best bang for the buck and something reliable that will last 10+ years (like these seemingly indestructable trinitons we have)! I'm strongly considering the Panasonic Viera Plasmas but hoping to get feedback from others more knowledgable...

Thanks!
-e
User avatar
cavedog
Golden
 
Posts: 969
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Fri 2/18/05 6:09 pm
Location: Champlin, MN

Re: Consumer Research

Postby The Rube » Wed 7/04/12 10:08 pm

I, and four other friends, each have the Viera series. Reliable, great picture, great value.
Also known as Brenthoven on USCHO.
User avatar
The Rube
Golden
 
Posts: 7628
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sun 4/10/05 11:01 am
Location: Chez Rube

Re: Consumer Research

Postby dxmnkd316 » Thu 7/05/12 1:22 am

I have a Viera TC-P50G25 and I love it enough to get the TC-P65GT50 this year. There are a number of websites you can look at that compare the specs for all of their series of TVs.
The name on the front of the jersey is more important than the name on the back -H.Brooks

st8ofhockey: Is that a photocollage of a dick? Oh wait, that's Patrick Stewart

psych: haha, damnit dx, your phone is drunk again
dxmnkd316: f*** you, I can't stop any time I want
dxmnkd316: err wait

I don't think I'm always right. I just find it hard to operate on the opposite assumption.
Disclaimer: 95% of the things I post are jokes, sarcasm, or hyperbole. Thanks in advance for not taking things so literally
User avatar
dxmnkd316
Post Whore
 
Posts: 15286 • Age: 28
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sun 10/09/05 4:24 am
Location: Oakdale

Re: Consumer Research

Postby jallengarry » Thu 7/05/12 7:08 am

cavedog wrote:
george wrote:
cavedog wrote:I'd love to know what the costs are for purchase/install and maintenance. We spend a fair amount of money on bottled and distilled h2o...


Jebus, you must have really bad water there. Our Edina water is notoriously hard and, in my opinion, they way over-chlorinate it. We make do just fine with a conventional softener and a small final filter (particulate and activated charcoal for taste/chlorine)on the cold water tap in the kitchen. RO seems overkill unless you have really bad incoming water or some serious need for high purity (I specify them for sterilizer systems, labs and some steam generation systems).


Yes, water is awful out here in Sherburne Co.


The water is pretty awful down south of Lakeville here too...hard as heck. Also, the city sent out letter (in Elko New Market here) that there has been some trace radium leaking into one of the two city wells. They are developing a plan for a water treatment facility now that the state is requiring more mandatory testing...but in the meantime we got a whole-house carbon tank in front of our softener and an RO system. You can get really detailed info on your cities water for free from several sites with a google search.

There are a lot of things to consider in the RO system you buy: Number of filters (I prefer 5) Carbon block vs. granular activated carbon filters (bloc is better), post re-mineralizers (improve taste), etc...and a lot of the ones you can get at the box stores are crap.
User avatar
jallengarry
Golden
 
Posts: 1574
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Mon 4/17/06 10:07 am

Re: Consumer Research

Postby WPoS » Thu 7/05/12 8:29 am

jallengarry wrote:
cavedog wrote:
george wrote:
cavedog wrote:I'd love to know what the costs are for purchase/install and maintenance. We spend a fair amount of money on bottled and distilled h2o...


Jebus, you must have really bad water there. Our Edina water is notoriously hard and, in my opinion, they way over-chlorinate it. We make do just fine with a conventional softener and a small final filter (particulate and activated charcoal for taste/chlorine)on the cold water tap in the kitchen. RO seems overkill unless you have really bad incoming water or some serious need for high purity (I specify them for sterilizer systems, labs and some steam generation systems).


Yes, water is awful out here in Sherburne Co.


The water is pretty awful down south of Lakeville here too...hard as heck. Also, the city sent out letter (in Elko New Market here) that there has been some trace radium leaking into one of the two city wells. They are developing a plan for a water treatment facility now that the state is requiring more mandatory testing...but in the meantime we got a whole-house carbon tank in front of our softener and an RO system. You can get really detailed info on your cities water for free from several sites with a google search.

There are a lot of things to consider in the RO system you buy: Number of filters (I prefer 5) Carbon block vs. granular activated carbon filters (bloc is better), post re-mineralizers (improve taste), etc...and a lot of the ones you can get at the box stores are crap.


I'd disagree with you on the the block vs GAC filters....GAC has WAY more surface area and is generally more preffered and efficient in water treatment applications. Block carbon filters do some particulate filtration that isn't really needed and causes them to plug up quicker than the useful life of the filter. Yes, I DO know SOMETHING about filtration...I designed water filtration systems and filters for 4+ years...

W
Beer Darts Champion of the WORLD!
User avatar
WPoS
Lifer
 
Posts: 3288
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Fri 4/11/03 5:06 pm
Location: lunatics annonymous

Re: Consumer Research

Postby fightclub30 » Thu 7/05/12 10:16 am

Looking to purchase a propane/Natural Gas grill soon.

My buddies all go out and spend $200 on a charbroil, or the home depot special of the day and end up with a rusted out POS in short order. I really dont want to do that. My dad has a Weber Natural Gas grill, that has seen 7 winters and honestly looks 2, maybe 3 years old and still works great. The Cheap charbroils, within 3 months the starter has broken, a burner knob has fallen off, etc.

Is this more to do with how they take care of them (i.e. do other people have better luck with the cheaper models?) or is this a case of you get what you pay for?

I was looking at the Weber Spirit E-310. I dont need or want a side-burner, and I dont need 1.7 Million square inches of cooking surface, I dont need a rotiserie, or any other bells and whistles. I just want a good grill that can get hot enough to sear and will last 7-10 years if possible. It seemed like a simple, well built, reasonably priced grill, but will this just get rusted out in 2 years as well? I dont want to spend $1,200 on a grill, in fact I dont want to spend more than $600 (just cant justify more than that right now).

Also what is the debate on keeping them covered or not? I plan to probably not cover it during the summer, but bring it into the garage and cover it for the winter.

Any insights into this would help. Thanks guys.
fightclub30
Super Vet
 
Posts: 1128 • Age: 26
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Mon 4/18/05 9:45 pm

Re: Consumer Research

Postby davescharf » Thu 7/05/12 10:38 am

fightclub30 wrote:Looking to purchase a propane/Natural Gas grill soon.

My buddies all go out and spend $200 on a charbroil, or the home depot special of the day and end up with a rusted out POS in short order. I really dont want to do that. My dad has a Weber Natural Gas grill, that has seen 7 winters and honestly looks 2, maybe 3 years old and still works great. The Cheap charbroils, within 3 months the starter has broken, a burner knob has fallen off, etc.

Is this more to do with how they take care of them (i.e. do other people have better luck with the cheaper models?) or is this a case of you get what you pay for?

I was looking at the Weber Spirit E-310. I dont need or want a side-burner, and I dont need 1.7 Million square inches of cooking surface, I dont need a rotiserie, or any other bells and whistles. I just want a good grill that can get hot enough to sear and will last 7-10 years if possible. It seemed like a simple, well built, reasonably priced grill, but will this just get rusted out in 2 years as well? I dont want to spend $1,200 on a grill, in fact I dont want to spend more than $600 (just cant justify more than that right now).

Also what is the debate on keeping them covered or not? I plan to probably not cover it during the summer, but bring it into the garage and cover it for the winter.

Any insights into this would help. Thanks guys.


I had asked some grill related questions awhile back in this thread too. I'm more curious though what the difference in the $500 and $900 grills are and what justifies the additional cost.
Member of the "Never used the 'ahh' smiley" in a post since September 2010.
User avatar
davescharf
Golden
 
Posts: 2835 • Age: 37
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Fri 2/11/05 7:22 am
Location: Back at the End of the Season Ticket waiting list..wherever that might be

Re: Consumer Research

Postby Gopherguy05 » Thu 7/05/12 10:52 am

davescharf wrote:
fightclub30 wrote:Looking to purchase a propane/Natural Gas grill soon.

My buddies all go out and spend $200 on a charbroil, or the home depot special of the day and end up with a rusted out POS in short order. I really dont want to do that. My dad has a Weber Natural Gas grill, that has seen 7 winters and honestly looks 2, maybe 3 years old and still works great. The Cheap charbroils, within 3 months the starter has broken, a burner knob has fallen off, etc.

Is this more to do with how they take care of them (i.e. do other people have better luck with the cheaper models?) or is this a case of you get what you pay for?

I was looking at the Weber Spirit E-310. I dont need or want a side-burner, and I dont need 1.7 Million square inches of cooking surface, I dont need a rotiserie, or any other bells and whistles. I just want a good grill that can get hot enough to sear and will last 7-10 years if possible. It seemed like a simple, well built, reasonably priced grill, but will this just get rusted out in 2 years as well? I dont want to spend $1,200 on a grill, in fact I dont want to spend more than $600 (just cant justify more than that right now).




Also what is the debate on keeping them covered or not? I plan to probably not cover it during the summer, but bring it into the garage and cover it for the winter.

Any insights into this would help. Thanks guys.


I had asked some grill related questions awhile back in this thread too. I'm more curious though what the difference in the $500 and $900 grills are and what justifies the additional cost.


$89 weber 23.5 inch kettle grill + 20lb bag of Kingsford Briquettes. Problem solved.
Last edited by Gopherguy05 on Thu 7/05/12 11:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Gopherguy05
Lifer
 
Posts: 2530 • Age: 30
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Fri 12/01/06 9:52 pm
Location: West St. Paul

Re: Consumer Research

Postby davescharf » Thu 7/05/12 11:39 am

Gopherguy05 wrote:
davescharf wrote:
fightclub30 wrote:Looking to purchase a propane/Natural Gas grill soon.

My buddies all go out and spend $200 on a charbroil, or the home depot special of the day and end up with a rusted out POS in short order. I really dont want to do that. My dad has a Weber Natural Gas grill, that has seen 7 winters and honestly looks 2, maybe 3 years old and still works great. The Cheap charbroils, within 3 months the starter has broken, a burner knob has fallen off, etc.

Is this more to do with how they take care of them (i.e. do other people have better luck with the cheaper models?) or is this a case of you get what you pay for?

I was looking at the Weber Spirit E-310. I dont need or want a side-burner, and I dont need 1.7 Million square inches of cooking surface, I dont need a rotiserie, or any other bells and whistles. I just want a good grill that can get hot enough to sear and will last 7-10 years if possible. It seemed like a simple, well built, reasonably priced grill, but will this just get rusted out in 2 years as well? I dont want to spend $1,200 on a grill, in fact I dont want to spend more than $600 (just cant justify more than that right now).


$89 weber 23.5 inch kettle grill + 20lb bag of Kingsford Briquettes. Problem solved.

Also what is the debate on keeping them covered or not? I plan to probably not cover it during the summer, but bring it into the garage and cover it for the winter.

Any insights into this would help. Thanks guys.


I had asked some grill related questions awhile back in this thread too. I'm more curious though what the difference in the $500 and $900 grills are and what justifies the additional cost.


I assume this bolded area is your response. As much as I love charcoal (and have a charcoal grill in addition to my gas one), I'm not fortunately enough to have an hour to make dinner every night I want to grill something. I can do it on weekends, but not during the week so gas is the only option for us then
Member of the "Never used the 'ahh' smiley" in a post since September 2010.
User avatar
davescharf
Golden
 
Posts: 2835 • Age: 37
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Fri 2/11/05 7:22 am
Location: Back at the End of the Season Ticket waiting list..wherever that might be

Re: Consumer Research

Postby Gopherguy05 » Thu 7/05/12 11:52 am

davescharf wrote:
Gopherguy05 wrote:
davescharf wrote:
fightclub30 wrote:Looking to purchase a propane/Natural Gas grill soon.

My buddies all go out and spend $200 on a charbroil, or the home depot special of the day and end up with a rusted out POS in short order. I really dont want to do that. My dad has a Weber Natural Gas grill, that has seen 7 winters and honestly looks 2, maybe 3 years old and still works great. The Cheap charbroils, within 3 months the starter has broken, a burner knob has fallen off, etc.

Is this more to do with how they take care of them (i.e. do other people have better luck with the cheaper models?) or is this a case of you get what you pay for?

I was looking at the Weber Spirit E-310. I dont need or want a side-burner, and I dont need 1.7 Million square inches of cooking surface, I dont need a rotiserie, or any other bells and whistles. I just want a good grill that can get hot enough to sear and will last 7-10 years if possible. It seemed like a simple, well built, reasonably priced grill, but will this just get rusted out in 2 years as well? I dont want to spend $1,200 on a grill, in fact I dont want to spend more than $600 (just cant justify more than that right now).


$89 weber 23.5 inch kettle grill + 20lb bag of Kingsford Briquettes. Problem solved.

Also what is the debate on keeping them covered or not? I plan to probably not cover it during the summer, but bring it into the garage and cover it for the winter.

Any insights into this would help. Thanks guys.


I had asked some grill related questions awhile back in this thread too. I'm more curious though what the difference in the $500 and $900 grills are and what justifies the additional cost.


I assume this bolded area is your response. As much as I love charcoal (and have a charcoal grill in addition to my gas one), I'm not fortunately enough to have an hour to make dinner every night I want to grill something. I can do it on weekends, but not during the week so gas is the only option for us then



Fixed above. Apparently I can't cut and paste real well.

I understand your point. I love my weber, but yes, there are sometimes when i just want a quick grilled burger that waiting an hour sucks.
User avatar
Gopherguy05
Lifer
 
Posts: 2530 • Age: 30
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Fri 12/01/06 9:52 pm
Location: West St. Paul

Re: Consumer Research

Postby Bertogliat » Thu 7/05/12 12:14 pm

fightclub30 wrote:Looking to purchase a propane/Natural Gas grill soon.

My buddies all go out and spend $200 on a charbroil, or the home depot special of the day and end up with a rusted out POS in short order. I really dont want to do that. My dad has a Weber Natural Gas grill, that has seen 7 winters and honestly looks 2, maybe 3 years old and still works great. The Cheap charbroils, within 3 months the starter has broken, a burner knob has fallen off, etc.

Is this more to do with how they take care of them (i.e. do other people have better luck with the cheaper models?) or is this a case of you get what you pay for?

I was looking at the Weber Spirit E-310. I dont need or want a side-burner, and I dont need 1.7 Million square inches of cooking surface, I dont need a rotiserie, or any other bells and whistles. I just want a good grill that can get hot enough to sear and will last 7-10 years if possible. It seemed like a simple, well built, reasonably priced grill, but will this just get rusted out in 2 years as well? I dont want to spend $1,200 on a grill, in fact I dont want to spend more than $600 (just cant justify more than that right now).

Also what is the debate on keeping them covered or not? I plan to probably not cover it during the summer, but bring it into the garage and cover it for the winter.

Any insights into this would help. Thanks guys.



I purchased a Kenmore grill in 2005 for about $350. At the time I was looking for a heavier, sturdier grill that looked like it could handle heavy use for 5+ years. I wanted 4 burners and a cermic coated grate to cook on. The grill has a side burner, which I only use in the summer and for saurkraut. It is a good looking grill and is still performing very nicely. No complaints. I recommend the electric starter over the push button. Mine still works well and I have yet to change the battery. Not sure how that is even possible....

Although the Kenmore name is not sexy, I have found that when comparing appliances, Kenmore consistently has equal or greater features and always a better price than their competitors. I always shop all brands yet I see I own a Kenmore water softener, dish washer, microwave, washer, dryer and grill.

Nearly all of my tools are craftsman, including the mower, snowblower and lawn vacuum. The table saws. Damn! :shock:
Fire Scott Ellison!
User avatar
Bertogliat
Golden
 
Posts: 1051 • Age: 38
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Wed 4/09/03 11:19 am
Location: Land of Lakes

Re: Consumer Research

Postby dxmnkd316 » Thu 7/05/12 1:22 pm

The Weber Performer. If it takes more than 20 minutes between you taking the cover off the grill and the charcoal being ready, you're doing it wrong.
The name on the front of the jersey is more important than the name on the back -H.Brooks

st8ofhockey: Is that a photocollage of a dick? Oh wait, that's Patrick Stewart

psych: haha, damnit dx, your phone is drunk again
dxmnkd316: f*** you, I can't stop any time I want
dxmnkd316: err wait

I don't think I'm always right. I just find it hard to operate on the opposite assumption.
Disclaimer: 95% of the things I post are jokes, sarcasm, or hyperbole. Thanks in advance for not taking things so literally
User avatar
dxmnkd316
Post Whore
 
Posts: 15286 • Age: 28
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sun 10/09/05 4:24 am
Location: Oakdale

Re: Consumer Research

Postby fightclub30 » Thu 7/05/12 1:37 pm

Then I regularly do it wrong.

I always end up with hot spots, so if I cook 4 burgers, usually one ends up crispy. I have to coat the briquettes in lighter fluid to get them to start, and if I dont wait long enough I end up tasting the lighter fluid in my food. The flare-ups from flipping burgers and steaks makes me feel like I am sending smoke signals. I dont prefer the taste of charcoal to propane either way (neither one is much different to me). Just for the hassle of tryign to grill 2-3 nights a week, I'd rather have a gas grill.
fightclub30
Super Vet
 
Posts: 1128 • Age: 26
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Mon 4/18/05 9:45 pm

Re: Consumer Research

Postby MNGophers29 » Thu 7/05/12 1:39 pm

Ahh, grills. I love selling grills. Here's the deal. With most anything else, you get what you pay for. If you buy a $200 grill, you are getting a $200 grill. If you buy a $650 grill, you get that. With all the lower end grills that we carry, Wal-Mart, Lowes, etc, etc, the bells and whistles are what is put on them to make them "different" from the next cheap grill. While the inexpensive grill has its purpose, I always start a customer with a Weber and go from there. I have sold Weber grills for 15 years, have never taken one back as being defective and the only time I ever get a repeat customer is when they are replacing their 25 year old Weber. Weber grills are simple, you can go nuts and get into the Summit series and you see a lot more stainless steel. I have a Weber Genesis E-320, it has the side burner, but that is all we had at the time I bought it 5 years ago. Btw, my grill still looks brand new. Anyway, the Spirit grills are going away after this year and Weber is changing that line for next year. Not sure what the plan is as of now, but they have stopped making the Spirit.

As for care, that has a lot to do with the cheap grills lasting. If you cover them, keep them in a garage, etc, they will last a year or 2 longer, but the guage of stainless used in each is quite different. The burners in a Char-Broil are not as thick as Weber's. Probably the most impressive thing with Weber and a little what you pay for is their customer service. They are made in Wisconsin and if you need a part, you call a Wisconsin resident and they ship it to your house at no charge. With Char-Broil, you have to call them and usually you get to pay for the parts (at least in my experience)

My advice, both professionally and personaly, go with a Weber. You will pay more up front, but 10 years from now when your grill still works great and looks great, you will be more than happy with your decision.
"Hard work will beat talent, if talent doesn't work hard"
Doug Woog - 1990

This quote was written on the chalkboard in a lockeroom in the old Ralph Engelstad arena my Squirt team used the day after the Gophers used it and came into the game ranked #1 in the nation and lost 6-1 to a second rate Sioux team.

Overhead on SiouxSports.com - Why does every thread always turn into a "Gopher" thread? Is there a secret infatuation with them?
User avatar
MNGophers29
Veteran
 
Posts: 690 • Age: 34
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sun 12/31/06 12:24 am
Location: Fargo via Grand Rapids, Bemidji, Madison WI, East Grand Forks.

Re: Consumer Research

Postby Bertogliat » Thu 7/05/12 2:02 pm

MNGophers29 wrote:Ahh, grills. I love selling grills. Here's the deal. With most anything else, you get what you pay for. If you buy a $200 grill, you are getting a $200 grill. If you buy a $650 grill, you get that. With all the lower end grills that we carry, Wal-Mart, Lowes, etc, etc, the bells and whistles are what is put on them to make them "different" from the next cheap grill. While the inexpensive grill has its purpose, I always start a customer with a Weber and go from there. I have sold Weber grills for 15 years, have never taken one back as being defective and the only time I ever get a repeat customer is when they are replacing their 25 year old Weber. Weber grills are simple, you can go nuts and get into the Summit series and you see a lot more stainless steel. I have a Weber Genesis E-320, it has the side burner, but that is all we had at the time I bought it 5 years ago. Btw, my grill still looks brand new. Anyway, the Spirit grills are going away after this year and Weber is changing that line for next year. Not sure what the plan is as of now, but they have stopped making the Spirit.

As for care, that has a lot to do with the cheap grills lasting. If you cover them, keep them in a garage, etc, they will last a year or 2 longer, but the guage of stainless used in each is quite different. The burners in a Char-Broil are not as thick as Weber's. Probably the most impressive thing with Weber and a little what you pay for is their customer service. They are made in Wisconsin and if you need a part, you call a Wisconsin resident and they ship it to your house at no charge. With Char-Broil, you have to call them and usually you get to pay for the parts (at least in my experience)

My advice, both professionally and personaly, go with a Weber. You will pay more up front, but 10 years from now when your grill still works great and looks great, you will be more than happy with your decision.


I always thought the dials on top of the wing table were a complete waste of space. Where do you set your plate/tray?
Fire Scott Ellison!
User avatar
Bertogliat
Golden
 
Posts: 1051 • Age: 38
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Wed 4/09/03 11:19 am
Location: Land of Lakes

Re: Consumer Research

Postby fightclub30 » Thu 7/05/12 2:03 pm

MNGophers29 wrote:Ahh, grills. I love selling grills. Here's the deal. With most anything else, you get what you pay for. If you buy a $200 grill, you are getting a $200 grill. If you buy a $650 grill, you get that. With all the lower end grills that we carry, Wal-Mart, Lowes, etc, etc, the bells and whistles are what is put on them to make them "different" from the next cheap grill. While the inexpensive grill has its purpose, I always start a customer with a Weber and go from there. I have sold Weber grills for 15 years, have never taken one back as being defective and the only time I ever get a repeat customer is when they are replacing their 25 year old Weber. Weber grills are simple, you can go nuts and get into the Summit series and you see a lot more stainless steel. I have a Weber Genesis E-320, it has the side burner, but that is all we had at the time I bought it 5 years ago. Btw, my grill still looks brand new. Anyway, the Spirit grills are going away after this year and Weber is changing that line for next year. Not sure what the plan is as of now, but they have stopped making the Spirit.

As for care, that has a lot to do with the cheap grills lasting. If you cover them, keep them in a garage, etc, they will last a year or 2 longer, but the guage of stainless used in each is quite different. The burners in a Char-Broil are not as thick as Weber's. Probably the most impressive thing with Weber and a little what you pay for is their customer service. They are made in Wisconsin and if you need a part, you call a Wisconsin resident and they ship it to your house at no charge. With Char-Broil, you have to call them and usually you get to pay for the parts (at least in my experience)

My advice, both professionally and personaly, go with a Weber. You will pay more up front, but 10 years from now when your grill still works great and looks great, you will be more than happy with your decision.


Okay, Thanks for the tips! Yes, in the store the 3-burner Weber felt a lot more solid at $499, than the $499 charbroil that had 5 burners, side burner, infra-red, etc. etc.

The Spirit is made in China, the Genesis is made in USA. The Spirit’s burners go horizontal, the Genesis go vertical. Genesis has front mounted knobs. These don’t make a $200 cost difference. I am assuming better gauge stainless is the likely culprit, along with made in USA. Is the extra $200 for the Genesis money well spent? I am leaning towards yes…
fightclub30
Super Vet
 
Posts: 1128 • Age: 26
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Mon 4/18/05 9:45 pm

Re: Consumer Research

Postby WPoS » Thu 7/05/12 2:39 pm

Bertogliat wrote:
fightclub30 wrote:Looking to purchase a propane/Natural Gas grill soon.

My buddies all go out and spend $200 on a charbroil, or the home depot special of the day and end up with a rusted out POS in short order. I really dont want to do that. My dad has a Weber Natural Gas grill, that has seen 7 winters and honestly looks 2, maybe 3 years old and still works great. The Cheap charbroils, within 3 months the starter has broken, a burner knob has fallen off, etc.

Is this more to do with how they take care of them (i.e. do other people have better luck with the cheaper models?) or is this a case of you get what you pay for?

I was looking at the Weber Spirit E-310. I dont need or want a side-burner, and I dont need 1.7 Million square inches of cooking surface, I dont need a rotiserie, or any other bells and whistles. I just want a good grill that can get hot enough to sear and will last 7-10 years if possible. It seemed like a simple, well built, reasonably priced grill, but will this just get rusted out in 2 years as well? I dont want to spend $1,200 on a grill, in fact I dont want to spend more than $600 (just cant justify more than that right now).

Also what is the debate on keeping them covered or not? I plan to probably not cover it during the summer, but bring it into the garage and cover it for the winter.

Any insights into this would help. Thanks guys.



I purchased a Kenmore grill in 2005 for about $350. At the time I was looking for a heavier, sturdier grill that looked like it could handle heavy use for 5+ years. I wanted 4 burners and a cermic coated grate to cook on. The grill has a side burner, which I only use in the summer and for saurkraut. It is a good looking grill and is still performing very nicely. No complaints. I recommend the electric starter over the push button. Mine still works well and I have yet to change the battery. Not sure how that is even possible....
Although the Kenmore name is not sexy, I have found that when comparing appliances, Kenmore consistently has equal or greater features and always a better price than their competitors. I always shop all brands yet I see I own a Kenmore water softener, dish washer, microwave, washer, dryer and grill.

Nearly all of my tools are craftsman, including the mower, snowblower and lawn vacuum. The table saws. Damn! :shock:


just had to do mine after 5 years...simple screw off ring and pop in a new battery

W
Beer Darts Champion of the WORLD!
User avatar
WPoS
Lifer
 
Posts: 3288
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Fri 4/11/03 5:06 pm
Location: lunatics annonymous

Re: Consumer Research

Postby cavedog » Thu 7/05/12 3:14 pm

The Rube wrote:I, and four other friends, each have the Viera series. Reliable, great picture, great value.



I joined the Viera club today - took advantage of $749.00 + free shipping for Panasonic VIERA TC-P50UT50 50-Inch 1080p Full HD 3D Plasma TV :dance:
User avatar
cavedog
Golden
 
Posts: 969
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Fri 2/18/05 6:09 pm
Location: Champlin, MN

Re: Consumer Research

Postby jallengarry » Thu 7/05/12 6:00 pm

WPoS wrote:
I'd disagree with you on the the block vs GAC filters....GAC has WAY more surface area and is generally more preffered and efficient in water treatment applications. Block carbon filters do some particulate filtration that isn't really needed and causes them to plug up quicker than the useful life of the filter. Yes, I DO know SOMETHING about filtration...I designed water filtration systems and filters for 4+ years...

W


Hmmmm...that's interesting. I'm not sure if your talking about drinking water applications or not as I'm suppose there would be different product choices for different applications. I'm no expert of the topic for sure. However, in reading SEVERAL reviews...including from consumer reports if I recall correctly...I literally never saw an article or a video that said the GAC was a better choice...particularly as the first pre-filter. Everything said exactly the opposite. Many use GAC later down the flow line as Block wouldn't be needed there but all the higher end models I looked at used block upfront. I saw SEVERAL things that listed a number of advantages of block filters that were very appealing. And everything said block filtered way more contaminants (7 to 19 times the smaller particle), had MORE surface area, didn't channel like GAC, didn't allow bacterial growth like GAC, had higher flow rate at the same size, less carbon fines (filter dust), etc...
User avatar
jallengarry
Golden
 
Posts: 1574
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Mon 4/17/06 10:07 am

Re: Consumer Research

Postby WPoS » Fri 7/06/12 7:23 am

aw for parise's sake...my whole post went poof when I hit a random button on my laptop that closed my browser..... :chainsaw:

here we go again.

first off Consmer reports, is fine, but it's CONSUMER reports. Doesn't mean they REALLY know what they are talking about. I'd trust real world application data anyday over them. I worked for Osmonics for all those years. They are now owned by GE.

Block Carbon filters have the following issues:
HIGH pressure drop
used for the WRONG reason

Carbon is to remove color and odor, not particulates. Using a block carbon filter for particulate filtration is a cheat. Particulate filtration is best done using a depth filter and pleated filters. Block carbon filters will channel just like any other filter and in fact, due to their high pressure drop will channel MORE once one is formed. I NEVER tested a block carbon filter that was good at filtering and had a low pressure drop. So if you have low pressure drop you are channeling. Low pressure is adverse to the RO element's effectiveness.

At Osmo we designed water filtration for Coke, Pepsi, bottled water plants, and whole cites. A typical water filtration system for drinking water is the following:

Larger micron depth filter (20 micron) > GAC bed filter > smaller micron depth filter (1-5 micron) > pleated submicron filter > RO unit. You can toss a UV light in as well to take care of bacteria if you want prior to the pleated.

Sorry to tell you this, but ALL filters are breeding grounds for bugs, it's surface area, the more surface area, the more places for bugs to grow. So "larger surface area" block filters would be worse that GAC bed filters.

Just sayin...

now all this said and done, home RO units are a HUGE comprimize to having to fit under the sink and be affordable so they cheat and try to combine as much as they can in the filters and "sell" you the "features"...not how I'd make my own for my home if I still worked at Osmo and had access to all the goodies I used to.

W
Beer Darts Champion of the WORLD!
User avatar
WPoS
Lifer
 
Posts: 3288
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Fri 4/11/03 5:06 pm
Location: lunatics annonymous

Re: Consumer Research

Postby dxmnkd316 » Fri 7/06/12 8:18 am

fightclub30 wrote:Then I regularly do it wrong.

I always end up with hot spots, so if I cook 4 burgers, usually one ends up crispy. I have to coat the briquettes in lighter fluid to get them to start, and if I dont wait long enough I end up tasting the lighter fluid in my food. The flare-ups from flipping burgers and steaks makes me feel like I am sending smoke signals. I dont prefer the taste of charcoal to propane either way (neither one is much different to me). Just for the hassle of tryign to grill 2-3 nights a week, I'd rather have a gas grill.


When I do burgers, I usually use a combination of direct and indirect heat. When the charcoal is ready (nearly all white), I push it off to one side of the grill. I throw the burgers over the direct heat for a minute or so on each side with the cover closed. Then I move them to the far side of the grill equidistant from the coals. I let them cook about 4-5 minutes a side with the cover closed. The temperature I target is 400 degrees in the top center of the grill.

Regarding the lighter fluid aspect, that's the benefit of using the Weber Performer. It uses a Coleman lantern to start the briquettes (about five minutes) and then I turn it off and let the charcoal hit temperature on its own.
The name on the front of the jersey is more important than the name on the back -H.Brooks

st8ofhockey: Is that a photocollage of a dick? Oh wait, that's Patrick Stewart

psych: haha, damnit dx, your phone is drunk again
dxmnkd316: f*** you, I can't stop any time I want
dxmnkd316: err wait

I don't think I'm always right. I just find it hard to operate on the opposite assumption.
Disclaimer: 95% of the things I post are jokes, sarcasm, or hyperbole. Thanks in advance for not taking things so literally
User avatar
dxmnkd316
Post Whore
 
Posts: 15286 • Age: 28
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sun 10/09/05 4:24 am
Location: Oakdale

Re: Consumer Research

Postby Greyeagle » Fri 7/06/12 11:45 am

dxmnkd316 wrote:I have a Viera TC-P50G25 and I love it enough to get the TC-P65GT50 this year. There are a number of websites you can look at that compare the specs for all of their series of TVs.


Have you seen the prices you can get on Sharp TVs via mother mining?
Piss on you, I'm working for Mel Brooks!
User avatar
Greyeagle
Golden
 
Posts: 11170 • Age: 46
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Wed 4/09/03 12:12 pm
Location: Pig's Eye

Re: Consumer Research

Postby dxmnkd316 » Fri 7/06/12 3:40 pm

Greyeagle wrote:
dxmnkd316 wrote:I have a Viera TC-P50G25 and I love it enough to get the TC-P65GT50 this year. There are a number of websites you can look at that compare the specs for all of their series of TVs.


Have you seen the prices you can get on Sharp TVs via mother mining?


I have. I'm just not an LCD fan. Good TVs, I just prefer plasma.
The name on the front of the jersey is more important than the name on the back -H.Brooks

st8ofhockey: Is that a photocollage of a dick? Oh wait, that's Patrick Stewart

psych: haha, damnit dx, your phone is drunk again
dxmnkd316: f*** you, I can't stop any time I want
dxmnkd316: err wait

I don't think I'm always right. I just find it hard to operate on the opposite assumption.
Disclaimer: 95% of the things I post are jokes, sarcasm, or hyperbole. Thanks in advance for not taking things so literally
User avatar
dxmnkd316
Post Whore
 
Posts: 15286 • Age: 28
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sun 10/09/05 4:24 am
Location: Oakdale

Re: Consumer Research

Postby Dances With Gophers » Fri 7/06/12 8:07 pm

My Sony Bravia literally went TU about 2 days after I read the latest posts in this thread. :chainsaw: Purchased in 2006, and it only lasts 6 years? :ahhh:
Suddenly, it all makes sense: "ND produces enough sugarbeets that produce enough sugar to sweeten 27 billion gallons of Kool-Aid." ND Fun Facts Image :ahhh:

March Madness http://y.ahoo.it/pYfn35Ni Yahoo! Group ID# 66004 Password: password Winner receives one (1) FREE U.S. flag flown over Afghanistan (so it's a bit dusty).
User avatar
Dances With Gophers
Golden
 
Posts: 5395 • Age: 40
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Wed 10/05/05 12:04 pm
Location: Minneapolis, MN

Re: Consumer Research

Postby Greyeagle » Fri 7/06/12 8:18 pm

dxmnkd316 wrote:
Greyeagle wrote:
dxmnkd316 wrote:I have a Viera TC-P50G25 and I love it enough to get the TC-P65GT50 this year. There are a number of websites you can look at that compare the specs for all of their series of TVs.


Have you seen the prices you can get on Sharp TVs via mother mining?


I have. I'm just not an LCD fan. Good TVs, I just prefer plasma.


Figured you had but wanted to make sure. :)
Piss on you, I'm working for Mel Brooks!
User avatar
Greyeagle
Golden
 
Posts: 11170 • Age: 46
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Wed 4/09/03 12:12 pm
Location: Pig's Eye

Re: Consumer Research

Postby dxmnkd316 » Fri 7/06/12 11:22 pm

Dances With Gophers wrote:My Sony Bravia literally went TU about 2 days after I read the latest posts in this thread. :chainsaw: Purchased in 2006, and it only lasts 6 years? :ahhh:


Another of the converts to the "Sony Blows Goats" fanclub?
The name on the front of the jersey is more important than the name on the back -H.Brooks

st8ofhockey: Is that a photocollage of a dick? Oh wait, that's Patrick Stewart

psych: haha, damnit dx, your phone is drunk again
dxmnkd316: f*** you, I can't stop any time I want
dxmnkd316: err wait

I don't think I'm always right. I just find it hard to operate on the opposite assumption.
Disclaimer: 95% of the things I post are jokes, sarcasm, or hyperbole. Thanks in advance for not taking things so literally
User avatar
dxmnkd316
Post Whore
 
Posts: 15286 • Age: 28
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sun 10/09/05 4:24 am
Location: Oakdale

Re: Consumer Research

Postby Orion » Sat 7/07/12 9:10 am

dxmnkd316 wrote:
Dances With Gophers wrote:My Sony Bravia literally went TU about 2 days after I read the latest posts in this thread. :chainsaw: Purchased in 2006, and it only lasts 6 years? :ahhh:


Another of the converts to the "Sony Blows Goats" fanclub?

But only proprietary goats that they created instead of a standardedized goat that everyone else uses and is much easier to blow
User avatar
Orion
Golden
 
Posts: 1615
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Wed 2/15/06 8:51 pm
Location: 13.2 miles from Mariucci

Re: Consumer Research

Postby dxmnkd316 » Sat 7/07/12 7:49 pm

Orion wrote:
dxmnkd316 wrote:
Dances With Gophers wrote:My Sony Bravia literally went TU about 2 days after I read the latest posts in this thread. :chainsaw: Purchased in 2006, and it only lasts 6 years? :ahhh:


Another of the converts to the "Sony Blows Goats" fanclub?

But only proprietary goats that they created instead of a standardized goat that everyone else uses and is much easier to blow


Them and Dell.
The name on the front of the jersey is more important than the name on the back -H.Brooks

st8ofhockey: Is that a photocollage of a dick? Oh wait, that's Patrick Stewart

psych: haha, damnit dx, your phone is drunk again
dxmnkd316: f*** you, I can't stop any time I want
dxmnkd316: err wait

I don't think I'm always right. I just find it hard to operate on the opposite assumption.
Disclaimer: 95% of the things I post are jokes, sarcasm, or hyperbole. Thanks in advance for not taking things so literally
User avatar
dxmnkd316
Post Whore
 
Posts: 15286 • Age: 28
Likes: 0 post • Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sun 10/09/05 4:24 am
Location: Oakdale

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bobwolf, skiier32 and 2 guests

www.gopherpucklive.com v4.0 © 2013 Gopher Puck Live